terça-feira, 25 de maio de 2010

Clipping Internacional, 25 de maio de 2010


Latin America Helps Shape Global Economic Recovery

May 24, 2010

Latin America has emerged from the global economic crisis in relatively good shape, and will be an important player to help rebuild the world economy, IMF officials say as Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn embarks on a week-long trip to the region.

Strauss-Kahn, who arrives in Brazil on May 25 and will also visit Peru, will reinforce the changing image of the IMF in Latin America, talk with political and business leaders as well as students, and promote the role of the IMF in harnessing global cooperation.

"We managed to overcome the first part of the crisis thanks to the unprecedented level of economic cooperation among the big countries, not only in the G-20 group of advanced and emerging economies, but in the G-20 plus," Strauss-Kahn told reporters before leaving.

Region bounces back from crisis

Latin America weathered the recent global economic crisis much better than in the past, thanks to stronger policies already in place and healthier economies that were more prepared for the downturn. Compared to other emerging economies, Latin America did better than many.

The IMF was able to support the region during the global economic crisis by quickly providing a new Flexible Credit Line (FCL) to emerging economies with solid policy track records. Mexico and Colombia each requested and received access to rapid funding, which neither country has needed to draw on.

Not only has the region emerged more quickly from the downturn than have advanced economies, but social costs in the region were more muted. In the larger Latin American economies, unemployment rose about 2 percentage points. In the United States, by contrast, unemployment rose 5.5 percentage points.

"This time around many things were saved – jobs, families, opportunities for children to get an education, as well as public spending and the ability to continue investing in infrastructure, health, and education," said Nicolas Eyzaguirre, head of the IMF's Western Hemisphere Department, in an interview with IMF Survey online.

While most advanced economies are projected to grow slowly in coming years, the prospects for Latin America are rosier. The regional economy contracted by 1.8 percent in 2009, but is expected to grow by about 4 percent in 2010, perhaps even a little more, which would keep pace with growth projections for the global economy.

Brazil has a key role to play in the global economy, including as a member of the G-20 advanced and emerging economies. As the IMF moves forward with reforms to its own governance structure, Brazil's influence will be part of the successful process of change within the institution.

In recent years, Peru and Brazil have made significant social progress, thanks to strong output and employment growth, and by investing in social safety nets to combat poverty and inequality. During the economic crisis, timely policy actions limited the fallout from the global crisis, while social safety nets provided an important lifeline.

Student townhall dialog

During his visit, Strauss-Kahn will take part in a high-level televised debate in Sao Paulo, Brazil on "the Global Economy in a Post-Crisis World," produced by GloboNews. Panelists will include Armínio Fraga Neto, the head of Brazil-based hedge fund Gávea Investment, which manages $5.8 billion in investments, and Maurício Botelho, president of business consulting firm Mogno and chairman of the board of the aviation company Embraer.

In Brasilia, Strauss-Kahn will meet with Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and with Finance Minister Guido Mantega.

Strauss-Kahn will then visit Lima, Peru where he will meet with President Alan Garcia and with Finance Minister Mercedes Araoz, as well as Central Bank Governor Julio Velarde.

A townhall-style discussion between Strauss-Kahn and university students at the Universidad San Marcos in Lima will cap the outreach campaign, Ask the IMF, with students from Peru and five other Latin American countries discussing issues of importance for the region, including global financial reforms, the effects on Latin America of the Greek crisis, and how to create sustainable economic growth.

Strauss-Kahn will also appear in a televised round table discussion with several regional finance ministers to discuss global challenges ahead of his address to the meeting of finance ministers of the Americas and Caribbean on May 28.


 


Look to the developing world

By Robert Zoellick

Published: May 24 2010 20:53 | Last updated: May 24 2010 20:53

Riots, debts and the creeping fear of a looming Lost Decade – no wonder there is pessimism in Europe. But what we are seeing is not just "financial crisis, part two"; it is "sustainable growth challenge, part one". The difference has implications for policy. Get the diagnosis wrong and the wrong treatment will follow.

The €750bn ($944bn, £652bn) package to defend the euro buys time. But it is not enough. So far, the world has focused on fiscal contraction and debt, but these are only half the story. The world and Europe also need a return to robust growth. Without it the fiscal adjustments will be more painful and the politics more unmanageable.

In the 1980s, when Latin America was overwhelmed by huge debts, the work-out involved rollovers of bank loans, fiscal tightening, funding from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank and policies to invigorate sustainable growth. Eventually, some debt was restructured. Some developed economies now face a similar problem: living beyond their means. But we face the added complication that weaknesses in parts of Europe can infect the European Union's monetary, credit and even fiscal systems, with dangerous consequences.

To avoid a decade-long work-out – with political and economic risks – the world needs stronger growth in developing and developed countries. We are seeing a shift towards a new multi-polar global economy, with better prospects in developing countries than in developed ones. The World Bank projects growth in developing economies of about 6 per cent this year and next – more than twice that of high-income countries. Since 2000, developing countries have accounted for more than half the rise in global demand for imports.

This is not about winners taking all. An acceleration of this shift can help developed countries work out their problems while building a better-balanced global system. A dollar spent on investment goods in developing countries can yield 35 cents worth of demand for capital goods produced in high-income countries, precisely the kind of high-value goods that generate well-paying jobs.

Drawing on China's experience in the late 1990s, some developing countries are boosting growth prospects through infrastructure to increase productivity. Countries throughout east and south Asia, Latin America and the Arab world are investing in transport, energy, water and urban centres, opening opportunities for sales of capital goods and services. They are experimenting with private capital and management in infrastructure, privatisation of assets and private sector delivery of public services.

Growth can be achieved through policy changes without government money. India's remarkable growth since the 1990s has combined manufacturing gains with service sector reforms. A World Bank study of 4,000 Indian companies from 1993 to 2005 shows that reforms in banking, telecoms and transport raised manufacturing productivity. Policy changes in Africa encouraged the private sector to invest more than $60bn in technology, bringing 65 per cent of Africans in reach of wireless voice services.

Financial crises can spur reform. Last year as developed economies focused on Keynesian changes in demand, Asia-Pacific economies were advancing reforms – especially in services – to generate higher growth. As developed economies focused on financial regulation and a broader reregulatory movement, Asians were considering how deregulation might foster innovation and jobs.

Developing countries have understood that a sustainable recovery depends on reviving the private sector. Businesses will invest if the policy environment enables them to turn a profit. More governments implemented regulatory reforms to make it easier to do business in 2009 than in any year since 2004, with nearly 300 reforms registered worldwide. Most occurred in developing economies.

In "sustainable growth challenge, part one", it is not about unmitigated austerity, but finding sustainable paths to prosperity. The EU and developed countries elsewhere need more than fiscal stringency, especially if achieved by piling on more taxes. They need to seize opportunities from growth in developing countries to avoid their own lost decade. There is a broader lesson: in 2008, the crisis was US-led; in 2010, it is European. For both the US and Europe, it is developing countries that point to the way ahead. It is time we took note.


 


Tiny and expensive, the 'cult' 500 helps Fiat play the long game in Brazil

May 24, 2010 6:43pm

For a fast-growing country in the midst of a car-buying boom, Brazil has surprisingly few luxury cars prowling its streets.

Sure, you will find Bimmers, Audis and Land Rovers in the swankier parts of São Paulo - but nowhere near the number you see in Shanghai or even Moscow.

What's more, in a market dominated by small, low-spec cars designed to pack in four or five passengers and do everything - school runs, shopping, commutes, and trips to the beach - the definition of luxury is decidedly lax.

Take for example Fiat's tiny 500 or Cinquecento, which sells for an eye-watering BRL60,000 ($32,400) or more in Brazil - more than twice what the car fetches in Europe, where it has gained a name as an icon of affordable style.

Why is the 500 so expensive, especially given Fiat's commanding position in Brazil, where it sells one in four of the cars and light trucks on the road - more, even, than it does in Italy?

Fiat doesn't make the car in Brazil, and so has to ship the car from Tychy, Poland. Once it gets to Brazil, like all imports the Cinquecento faces a 35 per cent import tax.

But more to the point, why does Fiat sell the 500 in Brazil at all? The car is promoted heavily in ads and on billboards across the country. Yet a company official acknowledges Fiat sells just 2,000 or so 500s a year - a tiny fraction of its top-selling economy models like the Fabio and the Uno.

The Cinquecento, he says, is a "cult" car it sells to burnish Fiat's overall brand, much the way Volkswagen sells modest numbers of its pricey Beetles in Brazil, but makes its money on cheap-and-cheerful Gols.

Fiat may be playing a long game here, though. Chrysler, its US alliance partner, is due to begin making the 500 in Mexico for the US market later this year.

Once that happens, the 500 can come to Brazil via a shorter trip, and - and because of the two countries' free-trade agreement, will get in without import tax. So count on the 500's lofty price coming down closer to where it belongs in Brazil - by "at least" a third, the Fiat official says.


 


Brazil set to become fourth-largest vehicle market

By John Reed in São Paulo

Published: May 24 2010 19:12 | Last updated: May 25 2010 11:22

Brazil is on track to overtake Germany as the world's fourth-largest vehicle market this year, as demand for cars in the country continues to surge past developed countries, carmakers and industry analysts say.

The country's resource-fuelled economic expansion has spurred strong growth in car buying over the past year that has outlasted the expiration of tax incentives introduced after the financial crisis in late 2008, which lapsed in March.

Volkswagen, the second-biggest carmaker in the country after Italy's Fiat, expects the market to grow 7 per cent this year, and said it could surpass Germany on total vehicle sales.

"This year depends on how the market in Europe goes," said Thomas Schmall, president of VW do Brasil. "It might be the same, but Brazil might overtake Germany."

General Motors, the third-largest carmaker in Brazil, is forecasting total industry sales of about 3.3m vehicles this year, a 5 per cent increase on a year ago.

Jaime Ardile, head of GM's Brazilian operation, said: "We believe 5 per cent annual growth is sustainable for Brazil over the next five years, with some upside given by the soccer world cup in 2014 and Olympic Games in 2016.

"This could make Brazil the fourth-largest auto industry in the world after China, the US and Japan."

The rise of Brazil in the industry reflects the migration of production capacity and investment from saturated developed countries to faster-growing emerging ones.

PwC expects Germany's light-vehicle market to decline by about 20 per cent this year to 3.18m from just under 4m last year, and Brazil's to grow by about 8 per cent to 3.3m.

Michael Gartside, senior analyst with PwC Autofacts, said: "If you take the light-vehicle market, we expect Brazil to overtake Germany this year".

But on car sales alone – excluding light commercial vehicles – Germany would still be a larger market than Brazil, he said.

Global carmakers are reporting that some of their biggest profits come from Brazil amid strong economic growth, expanding credit and growing demand for entry-level cars from people new to the middle class.

However, Brazil's four big incumbent carmakers – Fiat, VW, GM and Ford Motor – face increasing competition from Asian producers. South Korea's Hyundai and China's Chery Automobile both plan to build plants in Brazil. The strong Brazilian currency is fuelling expanding sales of imported cars.

Mr Schmall said VW aimed to outsell Fiat – which sells one in four light vehicles in Brazil – as the market leader by 2011, depending on how fast the market grew.


 



 


Le Brésil de Lula sur tous les fronts

Mis à jour le 24.05.10

Lula par-ci, Brésil par-là ! Le monde bruisse des déclarations du président brésilien et des hauts faits pas seulement footballistisques de ses concitoyens.

On a entendu Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva tancer l'Allemagne pour ses réticences à sauver la Grèce, et proposer sa médiation dans le conflit israélo-palestinien.

On l'a vu essayer de désamorcer avec les Turcs le dossier nucléaire iranien, et soutenir les Argentins dans leur conflit contre les Britanniques à propos des Malouines et de leur pétrole.

Mais "l'homme le plus populaire du monde", selon Barack Obama, ne s'appuie pas seulement sur son charisme pour parler haut et fort. Il incarne un Brésil en pleine forme qui, après un passage à vide dû à la crise, talonne la Chine et l'Inde en termes de croissance.

Petrobras, le groupe pétrolier qui est l'entreprise la plus lucrative d'Amérique latine, Vale, leader mondial du fer, l'avionneur Embraer qui pourrait bien damer le pion à Boeing et Airbus avant longtemps, ne sont que les fleurons d'une économie industrielle de premier ordre.

Côté agricole, la montée en puissance est comparable, et a valu au Brésil le titre de "grenier du monde". Soja, sucre, éthanol, café, fruits, coton, poulets, etc. en font un concurrent redoutable pour les éleveurs européens.

C'est en 2008 que le Brésil a pris conscience de ses capacités économiques. Jusque-là, il négociait à l'Organisation mondiale du commerce, mais de façon un peu frileuse. La crise partie des Etats-Unis et l'effondrement de la production industrielle des pays dits avancés l'ont persuadé que l'heure était à l'offensive.

Désormais, c'est le Brésil, brillamment représenté par son ministre des affaires étrangères, Celso Amorim, qui pousse le plus fort pour une conclusion des négociations du cycle de Doha. En comparaison, les Etats-Unis semblent englués dans un protectionnisme d'un autre temps.

Moins redouté que la Chine ou l'Inde, milliardaires en population, mieux considéré qu'une Russie rentière de ses matières premières, le Brésil est le véritable porte-parole de ces économies émergentes qui tirent la croissance mondiale. L'axe économique du monde se déplaçant vers le Sud, il peut réclamer à bon droit que ceux qui se substituent ainsi aux pays du Nord en panne de vitalité soient mieux représentés dans les instances internationales, à commencer par la Banque mondiale et le Fonds monétaire international (FMI). Sans oublier le Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU, au sein duquel le Brésil souhaite détenir un siège de membre permanent.

Parce que "le XXIe siècle sera le siècle des pays qui n'ont pas eu leur chance", et parce qu'il s'estime personnellement "à la moitié de [son] parcours politique", Lula (65 ans) pourrait présenter sa candidature au secrétariat général de l'ONU en 2012. Il devrait aussi militer pour améliorer le G20, dont il juge l'influence "très faible".

On n'a pas fini d'entendre l'ancien métallo, ami des favelas et des investisseurs. On n'a pas fini d'entendre parler d'un Brésil à l'aube de ses "trente glorieuses".


 


Le Brésil tente de contrôler l'envolée de sa croissance

Mis à jour le 24.05.10

Allegro ma non troppo : tel est le tempo que le gouvernement brésilien souhaite imprimer à la croissance de l'économie nationale. Or, depuis quelques mois, celle-ci progresse trop vite et court les risques d'une surchauffe à la chinoise.

Frappé tardivement par la crise mondiale, le Brésil fut l'un des premiers pays à s'en délivrer. Et de quelle manière ! Après avoir subi un léger recul du produit intérieur brut (PIB) de 0,2 % en 2009, son économie caracole à nouveau, et plus rapidement qu'avant la crise.

Selon une projection de la banque centrale, la croissance a fait un bond de 9,84 % au cours du premier trimestre par rapport à la même période de 2009, et de 2,38 % par rapport à la période octobre-décembre 2009. L'économie pourrait croître de 6 % à 7,5 % en 2010, un record sur les vingt-cinq dernières années.

Les signes de surchauffe sont visibles. Principal moteur de la croissance, la consommation intérieure tourne à plein régime. Elle est entretenue par la fièvre d'achats des quelque 25 millions de Brésiliens qui ont depuis dix ans rejoint la classe moyenne et découvert les charmes du crédit. Au premier trimestre, le commerce a augmenté de 13 %.

En trois mois, le Brésil a créé près d'un million d'emplois. Il devrait en créer 2,5 millions en 2010 sur un marché qui reste tendu à cause de la pénurie de main-d'oeuvre qualifiée dans certains secteurs en plein essor, comme l'industrie pétrolière. De janvier à mars, plus de 11 000 visas de travail ont été accordés à des étrangers, un chiffre en hausse de 16 %.

Les importations destinées à satisfaire la demande intérieure en biens d'équipement et en produits industriels devraient, pour la première fois depuis 2000, dépasser les exportations, constituées, pour l'essentiel, de matières premières agricoles et minières, notamment à destination de la Chine, premier client du Brésil.

Pour prévenir l'aggravation du déficit de la balance des paiements, le gouvernement vient d'adopter une série de mesures d'aide aux exportateurs, pénalisés de surcroît par la trop forte valeur du real, la monnaie nationale.

Mais ce qui inquiète surtout les dirigeants, c'est le réveil de l'inflation, ce fléau qui a tant ravagé l'économie du Brésil dans le passé. La hausse des prix atteint 5,3 % depuis un an, et devrait être de 5,5 % en 2010, soit un point de plus que l'objectif officiel (4,5 %). Pour le président, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, il est politiquement impératif de contenir l'inflation, la pire ennemie des pauvres.

D'où la décision prise par la banque centrale, fin avril, de relever de 0,75 point son taux directeur, à 9,50 %. Une première depuis près de deux ans, qui devrait être suivie par d'autres augmentations. Avec pour souci d'agir en douceur pour ne pas trop "refroidir" l'économie.

Cette mesure ponctuellement indispensable ne remet pas en question, à long terme, la baisse progressive des taux qui, en termes réels, sont passés de 20 % en 2003 à 5 % aujourd'hui. Ces taux restent très attractifs pour les spéculateurs étrangers, séduits par le Brésil, depuis que les agences de notation en ont fait, en 2008, un "pays sûr".

En 2010, les investissements directs étrangers devraient atteindre le chiffre record de 45 milliards de dollars. A la Bourse de Sao Paulo, ils sont supérieurs aux investissements des institutions et des personnes physiques.

Et pourtant, si le Brésil approche de la surchauffe, c'est qu'il n'investit pas assez dans son appareil productif. Il épargne également trop peu : 19 % de son PIB (contre 40 % en Chine). Luciano Coutinho, président de la Banque de développement économique et social (BNDES), estime à 25 % les taux d'investissement et d'épargne souhaitables pour que le Brésil puisse affronter une croissance annuelle de 10 %.

Cet argent devrait financer le développement des infrastructures, notamment routières et portuaires, qui saturent, et l'amélioration de l'enseignement public et professionnel, dont la faiblesse limite les gains de productivité. Faute de quoi, le pays risque de manquer encore plus de machines, d'espace et de main-d'oeuvre qualifiée.

En attendant, pour freiner la demande, le gouvernement a aboli les "carottes" fiscales instaurées pendant la récession pour doper la consommation. Il a annoncé 17 milliards de dollars (13,3 milliards d'euros) de coupes dans les dépenses publiques. Mais, sur ce terrain de l'austérité, sa marge de manoeuvre budgétaire est réduite en cette année d'élection présidentielle.

Il y a quelques jours, à Madrid, le président Lula célébrait "le moment magique" que vit l'économie brésilienne. Pour que cette magie dure, il n'est ni souhaitable ni raisonnable que celle-ci croisse cette année au-delà de 6 %.

"Nous ne voulons pas voler au-delà de ce qui était programmé", résumait le ministre de la planification, Paulo Bernardo. Rassurant, le ministre de l'économie, Guido Mantega, rajoutait en plaisantant : "Après tout, contrôler la surchauffe est une tâche plutôt agréable." Une tâche que beaucoup de ses homologues, ici ou là, lui envient.


 


Iran Deal Seen as Spot on Brazilian Leader's Legacy

By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO | Published: May 24, 2010

SÃO PAULO — When the Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, went to Tehran two weeks ago, he was hoping to defuse a seemingly intractable crisis over Iran's nuclear program and cement his reputation as an international statesman.

But after Brazil and Turkey forged a deal with Iran to exchange uranium, Mr. da Silva returned home to a cloud of criticism by opinion-makers and lawmakers who questioned whether the mission had been naïve, or worse, detrimental to the nation's standing.

Some argued that Iran had used him to stall for more time to develop nuclear arms. Others fretted that he had damaged Brazil's relationship with the United States, and that its own nuclear program could now come under greater scrutiny by atomic energy regulators.

What could have been one of Mr. da Silva's crowning achievements as president of a country ascending on the global stage was being characterized as a misstep that could dent the legacy of the popular president.

"The most charitable interpretation is that we were naïve," said Amaury de Souza, a political analyst in Rio de Janeiro. But "in a game like this, being labeled naïve just shows you have a third-rate diplomacy."

Brazil and Turkey helped broker an agreement under which Iran agreed to send uranium enriched at a low level abroad, reviving parts of a fuel swap plan proposed in October. But despite the deal, Iranian officials said they planned to continue enriching uranium.

Brazilian officials claimed to be caught flat-footed by that statement, dismissing it as pandering to Iran's domestic constituency.

Washington quickly rejected the deal as a delaying tactic, and the United Nations Security Council's five permanent members agreed on a draft resolution for new sanctions against Iran.

But Brazilian officials have continued to vigorously defend the accord, with the nation's foreign minister, Celso Amorim, saying Friday that it was not too late. "Many things still need to happen," he told reporters. "It's difficult, but there is a way out."

Ali Asghar Soltanieh, the Iranian ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, confirmed that his country had officially notified the agency about the nuclear agreement with a letter on Monday.

"We expect to turn from a course of confrontation to cooperation and come to a negotiating table," he said in an interview.

Brazilian officials have called the negative response by American officials hypocritical. An adviser to Mr. da Silva said Monday that in the days leading up to Mr. da Silva's trip to Iran, President Obama sent a letter to the Brazilian leader outlining "various points that were very similar to what ended up in the agreement."

Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary general, said Monday that Iran moving forward on the deal with Brazil and Turkey could be a step toward a negotiated settlement. But the basic problem, he said, was the lack of confidence on both sides.

If Western powers continue to dismiss the deal, the repercussions could be serious for Brazil's reputation, political analysts said, with some warning that it could invite further scrutiny of Brazil's own nuclear program.

Brazil, with France's assistance, is building a nuclear-powered submarine. It is widely recognized as abiding by the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, allowing regular inspections by the I.A.E.A., and the nation prohibited the development of nuclear weapons in its most recent constitution. But Brazil has refused to sign an additional protocol of the treaty that would allow for more intrusive inspections.

Even before Mr. da Silva's visit to Tehran, a former foreign minister, Luiz Felipe Lampreia, said the efforts at diplomacy with Iran could "cause incalculable material and political losses" and raise suspicions about Brazil's own nuclear program.

"It is like the person who crosses the street on purpose to step on a banana peel on the opposite sidewalk," Mr. Lampreia wrote in the newspaper O Globo.

It did not help that after the signing in Tehran, Brazil's vice president, José Alencar, restated a position he has taken before: that Brazil should have the right to develop a nuclear weapon as an "instrument of dissuasion."

Despite the concerns, many Brazilians noted that Mr. da Silva had taken the international stage and waded into a top priority of the American agenda.

"President Lula ignored the critics and decided Brazil had as much right and legitimate interests to engage in this issue as the U.S. and other major players," said Paulo Sotero, director of the Brazil Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center.

Brazil's attempts to win over the Iranians have not always played well at home. After Brazil's minister of commerce jovially offered the yellow jersey of Brazil's national soccer team to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran last month, Clóvis Rossi, a respected columnist, wrote that the Brazilian jersey was "covered in blood" from Iranian dissidents killed by the Islamic government.

But many Brazilians seem proud to see Mr. da Silva mixing with world leaders. A poll in March by CNI/Ipope found that 48 percent of Brazilians polled remembered nothing specific about what he was doing. But 46 percent recalled his trips abroad.

Mr. Sotero said Mr. da Silva's legacy is most likely assured. But as for ties between Brazil and the United States, "We won't know the extent of the damage to the bilateral relationship for a while."


 


Clinton and Geithner Face Hurdles in China Talks


 

BEIJING — China and the United States opened three days of high-level meetings here on Monday meant to broaden and deepen the ties between the world's largest developed and developing economies.


But the opening session instead laid bare a recurring theme between Beijing and Washington: the United States came with a long wish list for China on both economic and security issues, while China mostly wants to be left alone to pursue policies that are turning it into an economic superpower.

President Hu Jintao, welcoming the 200-strong American delegation in the Great Hall of the People, praised the "mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation" between the United States and China. Such coordination, he said, had helped speed the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis.

On the crucial issue of China revaluing its currency — something the Obama administration had pushed for — Mr. Hu repeated China's past promises to make its effectively fixed exchange rate respond more to the market, but the fact that the country's top leader mentioned reform at all suggested it is on the leadership's agenda.

Still, Mr. Hu also repeated that Beijing would move "under the principle of independent decision-making, controllability, and gradual progress." Translation: China alone will determine the timing of any such move.

Economists said the deepening debt crisis in Greece, which came up immediately in the discussions on Monday, would make Beijing more reluctant to allow its currency to appreciate in value in the immediate future.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner did not mention China's currency in his opening remarks, though he did allude to it in subsequent sessions. The administration has decided not to prod Beijing at this meeting, officials said, concluding that it would resist outside pressure.

The United States is hitting similar hurdles on security issues. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
pressed China to support measures against North Korea following the strong evidence that it torpedoed a South Korean warship in March. But China has been skeptical of North Korea's role and is reluctant to punish the North, with which it has close ties.

And while China agreed to a watered-down United Nations resolution on Iran's nuclear program, it has not signed off on amendments against specific Iranian citizens and companies. With big planned investments in Iran's oil and gas industry, China may well be in business with some of them.

In her speech to the opening session, Mrs. Clinton cited Iran and North Korea as issues in which Beijing and Washington must find common cause. "Today, we face another serious challenge provoked by the sinking of the South Korean ship," she said. "So we must work together, again, to address this challenge and advance our shared objectives of peace and stability."

A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry, Ma Zhaoxu, was noncommittal, saying of the Korea crisis, "We hope all the relevant parties will exercise restraint and remain cool-headed."

Some of this is cultural, to be sure. Chinese officials tend to speak far less directly than Americans. Mr. Hu did not mention Iran and North Korea, referring to regional "hot spots." The fact that he frankly addressed the exchange rate of China's currency, the renminbi, surprised some observers, and lent itself to varying interpretations.

For some experts, Mr. Hu's pledge to "steadily advance the reform mechanism of the RMB exchange rate," without repeating his previous references to the rate being "basically stable," was a sign of conciliation. "It's important, the fact they haven't mentioned it," said Ben Simpfendorfer, the China economist for the Royal Bank of Scotland.

But others interpreted it as a pre-emptive move to take the issue off the table. Eswar Prasad, an economist at Cornell University, noted that the crisis in Greece had rattled the Chinese on two levels. It was likely to curb their exports to Europe, and it had strengthened the renminbi relative to the swooning euro, which makes Chinese goods more costly in foreign markets.

"That double hit on China's exports almost certainly means that they're not going to move forward unless there is evidence of stabilization in the euro and stabilization in Europe's recovery," Mr. Prasad said.

A senior Chinese official said that Beijing would keep a "high alert and attention on the euro zone sovereign debt crisis." He noted that it could affect not only Europe's economic recovery but also Chinese exports. China exports more to the European Union than to the United States.

The United States needed a 48-vehicle motorcade to ferry its delegation to this second round of the so-called strategic and economic dialogue. Among the prominent names: the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben S. Bernanke, the commander of the military's Pacific Command, Adm. Robert F. Willard, and the secretary of health and human services, Kathleen Sebelius.

Some of the topics under discussion veered far from economics and security. Mrs. Clinton singled out Melanne Verveer, the State Department's ambassador at large for women's issues, who is meeting with Chinese women's groups to discuss their progress in women's rights.

Mr. Geithner lobbied against Chinese government procurement rules giving preference to products with intellectual property developed in China. American businesses, particularly in technology, say this handicaps them and deprives China of state-of-the-art products. "Innovation flourishes best when markets are open, competition is fair, and strong protections exist for ideas and inventions," he said.

The Chinese have their pet issues as well: Beijing is pushing Washington to loosen controls on exports of high-technology equipment with potential military applications. A raft of questions from reporters for state-run Chinese media organizations suggested a coordinated campaign.

If American officials seemed likely to leave China with many of their wishes unfulfilled, there was one notable difference in this year's meeting compared to the one last year in Washington: the American economy is growing again, which gave Mr. Geithner a rare chance to crow a bit.

Rather than identify the United States with the troubled economies of Europe, Mr. Geithner said the United States was holding its own with emerging economies like Brazil, India, and China.

"Economic growth in the U.S. and China is broader and stronger than many had anticipated, even a few months ago," he said.


 


Brasil está em todas as frentes, diz Le Monde


O vespertino francês Le Monde traz em sua edição desta segudna-feira, um grande editorial na capa sobre o papel de destaque alcançado pela  diplomacia brasileira durante o governo Lula. Em tom elogioso, o jornal diz que a atuação do ministro brasileiro das Relações Exteriores, Celso Amorim, é brilhante. E, nas páginas internas, o crescimento excepional do PIB brasileiro atrai a curiosidade do jornal. Segundo previsão divulgada hoje pelo Banco Central do Brasil, a economia deve crescer 6,46% neste ano.

O editoral do jornal Le Monde não poupa elogios à economia brasileira e ao papel do Brasil na cena internacional. O vespertino lembra os pronunciamentos do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva diante da crise grega e suas iniciativas de mediação no conflito israelo-palestino, além do recente acordo conseguido junto com a Turquia no complicado dossiê nuclear iraniano. Fatos importantes que vão bem além do talento dos brasileiros no futebol, ironiza Le Monde.

Um dinamismo no cenário internacional encabeçado de forma brilhante pelo ministro brasileiro da Relações Exteriores, Celso Amorin, relata o jornal. O vespertino lembra que durante muito tempo o Brasil negociou timidamente suas questões econômicas com a OMC, mas que a situação mudou. Agora Amorim é um dos principais atores na busca de uma conclusão do empacado Ciclo de Doha sobre a liberalização do comércio mundial.

Já em suas páginas internas, Le Monde elogia a economia brasileira. O vespertino relata que apenas no primeiro trimestre desse ano o Produto Interno Bruto do país cresceu 9.84% e que quase um milhão de empregos foram criados no Brasil nesse período. Resultados de uma economia aquecida pelo consumo interno, impulsionado pelos 25 milhões de brasileiros que integraram a classe média na ultima década.

Le Monde alerta, no entanto, para um risco superaquecimento da economia brasileira. O jornal explica que o grande desafio para o país agora é controlar a sua inflação, a pior inimiga dos pobres, escreve o jornal francês, citando Lula.

O jornal francês lembra, ainda citando o presidente brasileiro, que o século 21 será o século dos países que não tiveram suas oportunidades. E diz ainda que já Lula, que se considera ainda na metade de sua carreira politica, ele poderá muito bem apresentar sua candidatura para o cargo de secretário-geral das Nações Unidas, em 2012.


 


Former CIA officer on Iran: Brazil and Turkey are vital checks and balances

Shouldn't the world welcome the actions of two significant, responsible, democratic, and rational states to intervene and help check the foolishnesses of decades of US policy on Iran?

By Graham E. Fuller / May 24, 2010 | Washington

If Washington thinks it now faces complications on getting United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran, that's not the half of it. A greater obstacle is the subtle change introduced into international power relationships by the actions of Brazil and Turkey that has accompanied it.

These two medium-size powers, Brazil and Turkey, have just challenged the guiding hand of Washington in determining nuclear strategy towards Iran. They undertook their own initiative to persuade Iran to accede to a deal on the handling of nuclear fuel issues. Not only was that initiative entirely independent, it moved ahead in the face of fairly crude American warnings to both states not to contemplate it – even though it closely paralleled one offered to Iran last year that fell through, mainly due to Iranian maneuvering and its fundamental distrust of Washington's intent and blustering style.

Adding insult to injury, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan both had the temerity to actually succeed in their negotiations with Iran while Washington was publicly predicting their certain (and hoped for) failure.

Are the Iranians simply engaging in another con game, playing for time – a maneuver at which they excel? Or has something more profound taken place?

First, it is not only the terms of the deal that matter, but the messengers and atmospherics. Washington for decades has dealt with Iran – almost always indirectly – with considerable truculence and belligerence as the background music to "negotiations." This is business as usual – the world's sole superpower demanding others to agree to its strategy of the moment.

When Mr. Lula and Mr. Erdogan came to Tehran, the game was entirely different. It wasn't the content so much as the negotiators, the venue, and the atmospherics. Tehran did not feel this time that it was acceding to superpower pressure, but to a reasoned and respectful request by two significant peer states in the world with no record of imperialism in Iran. In one sense, the deal was almost bound to succeed. What Iran wants as much as anything in this world is to blunt US dominance of the international order, and especially its ability to dictate terms in the Middle East.

If Iran is to yield at all on nuclear policy, what better device than to accede to two respected and successful states that were themselves defying Washington's wishes in even attempting negotiations? If Tehran had refused that offer, it might have torpedoed the very concept of independent alternative, non-American efforts in international strategy. It made all the sense in the world for Iran to say "yes" this time to this combination of approach.

The same goes for China and Russia. After the Lula-Erdogan success, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton immediately proclaimed her own success at garnering Russian and Chinese support for enhanced sanctions against Iran – a stunningly insulting response to the remarkable accomplishment of Brazilian and Turkish negotiation. These states are, after all, immensely important to US regional and global interests. To blow them off like that was a major blunder, not just in terms of Iran, but in broader global strategy. The rest of the world has surely taken further negative note that Washington's game remains depressingly familiar.

But do we really believe Clinton has in fact garnered Russian and Chinese support? Just as Tehran had every incentive to accept a proposal from "equals," offered with respect instead of bluster and threats, so too Russia and China have every reason to welcome this initiative from Brazil and Turkey. Yes, the terms of the agreement do matter somewhat, but what is far more important for them is the slow but inexorable decay of US ability to deliver international diktats and to have its way. This is what Chinese and Russian foreign-policy strategy is all about. Neither of these countries will, in the end, permit the US hard-line approach to win out over the Brazilian-Turkish one in the Security Council, even if the Brazilian-Turkish deal requires a little tweaking. Russia and China champion the emergence of multiple sources of global power and influence that chip away at dying American unipolar power.


 

China and Russia, of course, represent the alternative polarity in the emerging struggle to end American hegemony in international affairs. But of greater moment, they now witness the political center in international politics shifting away from Washington as well. These two countries that defied American wishes are not just some Third World rabble-rousers scoring cheap points off the US. They are two major countries that are supposedly close friends of the US This makes the affront even crueler.

These events are profound signs of the times. The problem with unipolar power is that without checks and balances it invariably becomes subject to error and foolishness. On occasion, Americans actually believe in checks and balances when it comes to our own Constitution. Microsoft may be a great corporation, but nobody wants it to have a monopoly on IT.

Similarly in the world, international checks and balances are valuable safety valves. When Washington moves into its fourth decade of paralysis and incompetence in handling Iran, still unable even to speak to it – just as it cannot bring itself to talk to Cuba after 50 years – it has exacerbated the problem, strengthened Iran and the forces of radicalism in the Middle East, polarized emotions and, worst, failed in all respects. Shouldn't the world welcome the actions of two significant, responsible, democratic, and rational states to intervene and help check the foolishnesses of decades of US policy? That is what checks and balances are all about and why the center is shifting.

And, who knows? "Rogue states" – a term beloved in Washington in reference to recalcitrant countries that don't toe the Washington line – may more readily come to accede to new approaches free of the old imperial techniques of interventionism and ultimatums. Meanwhile, the US is rapidly running the risk of becoming its own "failed state" in terms of being able to exercise competent and effective international leadership since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Graham E. Fuller is the former vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA and author of numerous books on international politics, including the forthcoming "A World Without Islam" (August 2010).


 


Lula: jugar en primera división sin mojarse

JORGE CASTAÑEDA 24/05/2010

Hace tiempo que el Brasil de Lula busca un papel global, y que el mundo reconoce sus méritos y celebra sus esfuerzos. La prensa internacional ha hecho del gigante sudamericano la niña de sus ojos, colocando en un mismo plano el carisma de Lula, el Mundial de Fútbol del 2014, las Olimpiadas del 2016, el desempeño de Itamaratí (la Cancillería) en la Ronda Doha y el creciente papel brasileño en América Latina, desplazando tanto a México como a Estados Unidos, incluso en el patio trasero de ambos: Honduras.

En realidad, detrás de unas magníficas relaciones públicas y 16 años de buen gobierno (Cardoso y Lula), aunados a un crecimiento económico mediano pero sostenido, se perfilan varias aventuras diplomáticas fallidas, disimuladas por la superficialidad y la inercia mediáticas. Pero quizás se acerque la hora de la verdad, ya sea para confirmar el surgimiento de un nuevo protagonista global, ya sea para corroborar una obviedad: no bastan las ganas para ser una potencia mundial.

En efecto, el intento de Lula por lograr, de la mano de Turquía y de su mágica mancuerna diplomática (el primer ministro Erdogan y el canciller Davutoglu), un acuerdo con el régimen iraní que impidiera la imposición de nuevas sanciones a Teherán puede convertirse en un éxito notable o en una debacle. Los dos miembros no permanentes del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU (CSONU) presentaron la semana pasada un acuerdo con el presidente Ahmadineyad cuyo propósito ostensible consiste en evitar que el programa de enriquecimiento de uranio iraní se traduzca en la fabricación de una arma atómica. Para ello, propusieron canjear, en el plazo de un año, uranio enriquecido de bajo grado iraní por varillas occidentales de uranio enriquecido de alto grado, destinadas exclusivamente al reactor de investigación de Teherán.

El propósito real residió, sin embargo, en impedir que el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas considerara -y en su caso aprobara- un paquete de nuevas sanciones contra el país gobernado por los ayatolás. Dicha eventualidad hubiera obligado a Ankara y a Brasilia a afrontar una disyuntiva del diablo: seguir el consenso anti-Teherán y traicionar su propia retórica, u oponerse a una resolución patrocinada por los miembros permanentes del Consejo de Seguridad y quedarse solos en el intento, mostrando el aislamiento y la confrontación que entraña su "nueva diplomacia".

La lógica turca es evidente. La república aún kemalista posee intereses reales en la zona. Lleva a cabo un comercio intenso con su vecino; tiene en común una población kurda significativa; recibe parte de su gas y petróleo de Irán; una proporción importante de la población iraní habla turco. Su nueva política exterior consiste en alejarse de las viejas posturaspro Estados Unidos y pro Israel (Turquía es miembro fundador de la OTAN) y en acercarse a sus vecinos -Siria, Grecia e Irán, por supuesto- y al mundo islámico en su conjunto.

La lógica brasileña es menos obvia. No hay intereses significativos de Brasil en Irán, el antisemitismo de Ahmadineyad es mal visto por la comunidad judía de São Paulo, e Itamaratí sabe muy bien que pocas cosas exasperan más a los norteamericanos que un país aliado sin "vela en el entierro" entorpezca sus propósitos, con independencia de la justeza de estos últimos. En el fondo, el gambito de Lula es otro: utilizar la inminente crisis iraní para consolidar su lugar en el firmamento diplomático internacional.

El problema es que el acuerdo de Teherán no bastó para impedir la presentación de un proyecto de resolución por Washington y los demás miembros permanentes del Consejo, que contempla una cuarta etapa de sanciones con más dientes y más amplias. Todo indica, incluso, que los norteamericanos pudieron contar desde antes del esfuerzo turco-brasileño con los nueve votos necesarios para aprobar su resolución, dada por lo menos la abstención rusa y china para evitar un veto. Austria, Japón, Gabón, Uganda y México se encontraban en principio a bordo y Bosnia-Herzegovina y Nigeria en el limbo. Ya existía en principio una coalición suficiente para imponer nuevas sanciones, incluyendo un embargo de materiales susceptibles de ser utilizados para la construcción de misiles y no sólo de la ojiva nuclear que portarían.

Así, de prosperar la iniciativa de Estados Unidos, Francia y el Reino Unido (apoyada por Alemania y tolerada, en todo caso, por Rusia y por China), Brasil se hallaría en el peor de los mundos posibles. Tendrá que tomar partido, después de buscar evitarlo a través de un compromiso que adoleció de un defecto congénito. Una de las partes, es decir, Washington, nunca estuvo de acuerdo, aunque Davutoglu insista en que todo fue consultado con la secretaria de Estado Clinton. Si Brasil aprueba las sanciones en el CSONU, se habrá desdicho de su rechazo a las mismas; si vota en contra, lo hará en compañía, en el mejor de los casos, solo de Turquía y Líbano. Y si se abstiene, confirmará lo que muchos hemos reiterado: Lula quiere jugar en primera división, pero sin mojarse.

He aquí el quid del asunto. En realidad, Brasil ha logrado poco en el ámbito internacional, más allá de titulares. El objetivo diplomático número uno de Lula -lograr un escaño permanente en el Consejo de Seguridad- se ve, al término de ocho años de esfuerzos, menos viable que nunca. La aventura en Honduras resultó en una tragicomedia tropical: Brasil no pudo restituir a su asilado huésped Manuel Zelaya, este permaneció varios meses en la Embajada brasileña, y hoy Itamaratí solo puede chantajear a españoles y mexicanos con su ausencia en caso de cualquier invitación o reconocimiento al nuevo presidente hondureño. La reanudación de la Ronda de Doha sigue indefinidamente pospuesta, Copenhague no resultó y Cancún no promete, e incluso las diversas iniciativas regionales presentadas por Brasil de la mano con Hugo Chávez se hallan estancadas.

Ello se debe a una debilidad intrínseca del esquema. El tamaño de una economía (Japón) o de una demografía (India) no otorga ipso facto el estatuto de actor mundial. Más bien es la toma de partido, los valores impulsados y la eficacia a escala regional lo que, en su conjunto, pueden (o no) convertirse en una catapulta al estrellato internacional. Brasil linda con nueve países, y todos ellos padecen serios conflictos internos (Colombia, Bolivia, Venezuela) o con sus vecinos (Argentina con Uruguay, Colombia con Venezuela y Ecuador, Perú con Ecuador y con Chile, Bolivia con Chile). Pero Lula en ese pantano no ha querido incursionar: mantiene una prudente pasividad antiintervencionista, o un franco respaldo a las posiciones bolivarianas de Chávez, Correa, Morales, Daniel Ortega en Nicaragua y los hermanos Castro en La Habana. Se resiste a impulsar valores, a tomar partido, o a buscar resultados concretos en su propio terreno.

Tal vez resulte más fácil mediar entre Teherán y Washington (aunque nadie lo ha logrado desde 1979) que entre Caracas y Bogotá, o entre Buenos Aires y Montevideo. A pesar de su patente irritación, quizás Barack Obama y Hillary Clinton prefieran darle el beneficio de la duda al proyecto turco-brasileño antes que ceder a la impaciencia de Israel y de Francia. Lula puede salir airoso de su lance en las planicies persas o acabar mal con todos. Posiblemente debiera haberse mostrado satisfecho con las portadas de las revistas, sin buscar en exceso llenarlas de contenido. Suele ser más difícil.

Jorge Castañeda, ex secretario de Relaciones Exteriores de México, es profesor de Estudios Latinoamericanos en la Universidad de Nueva York.


 


Brasil: advierten que falta inversión vial

BRASILIA (EFE).- Brasil precisa invertir 183.500 millones de reales (99.100 millones de dólares) en obras de mantenimiento de su red de carreteras y en la construcción de nuevas vías y puentes, según un informe divulgado ayer por un organismo oficial.

El estudio del Instituto de Pesquisa Económica Aplicada (IPEA), un organismo adscripto a la presidencia de la república, indica que, a pesar de que las inversiones en carreteras crecieron un 290% entre 1999 y 2008, ese volumen aún no basta para solucionar los problemas de la red vial del país.

El IPEA analizó el impacto del llamado Programa de Aceleración del Crecimiento (PAC), un millonario plan de infraestructura que el gobierno de Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva puso en marcha en 2007, y concluyó que sólo ha abarcado el 13 por ciento de las inversiones necesarias en las carreteras federales.

"El PAC es un avance en relación con lo que se había hecho antes, pero aún es insuficiente para solucionar la situación de la red vial del país", declaró en rueda de prensa el coordinador de Infraestructura Económica del IPEA, Carlos Alvares da Silva Campos Neto.

También destacó que las obras previstas en el PAC para el sector de carreteras están atrasadas en un 70% por distintas razones, en su mayoría de origen burocrático.

Pronósticos

Actualmente, según el IPEA, Brasil cuenta con unos 61.000 kilómetros de carreteras pavimentadas dentro de jurisdicción federal, de los cuales cerca de un 70 por ciento precisa reparaciones o ampliaciones. Además, existen otros 29.000 kilómetros de carreteras que están bajo administración privada o regional, que no fueron incluidos en el informe elaborado por el instituto.

En tanto, Brasil proyectó ayer un crecimiento del 6,46 por ciento en su PBI para este año a través de su Banco Central. Lula también anticipó ayer que proyecta crear este año dos millones de puestos de empleo.


 


PESE A LA COMPETENCIA CHINA EL SECTOR CRECIÓ 11% EN 2009
El mercado automotriz de Brasil registra una vigorosa expansión
Ayudan los incentivos fiscales y, en especial, el impulso de una economía rica en recursos, con crédito en expansión y una clase media que crece a gran velocidad

Martes 25 de mayo de 201


La planta automotriz de Fiat cercana a Belo Horizonte, en la provincia brasileña de Minas Gerais no es sólo la más grande que tiene la compañía sino una de las que más activas del mundo. Consume 750 toneladas de acero diarios, funciona las 24 horas en tres turnos y produce un auto cada 20 segundos, o más de 3.000 unidades diarias.

El año pasado, la planta produjo 722.400 autos, ubicándose en segundo lugar sólo detrás de la gigante fábrica que tiene Volkswagen en Wolfsburg, Alemania, que registró 740.000 unidades en 2009.

Fiat, que pierde plata en Europa, obtuvo en 2009 una ganancia neta de u$s 863 millones en Brasil, donde controla una cuarta parte del mercado de autos livianos y vehículos comerciales. El año pasado por primera vez, la automotriz vendió más autos en este país sudamericano que en Italia.

A medida que la industria automotriz mundial busca recuperarse tras la profunda crisis, hay compañías del sector que están ganando grandes sumas en Brasil. Y casi todas están expandiendo sus operaciones allí.

Si bien el próspero mercado chino sigue siendo el campo de batalla más competitivo para el sector, Brasil ofrece mejores márgenes porque las automotrices internacionales no están obligadas a producir autos a través de joint ventures y, por lo tanto, no tienen que compartir ganancias con sus socios.

VW, la segunda automotriz del mercado, está invirtiendo 2.300 millones de euros en el país hasta 2014.

General Motors, el tercero, no da a conocer sus resultados pero, según un ejecutivo de la compañía, estuvo "imprimiendo dinero" en Brasil.

Ford Motor, el más chico de las "cuatro grandes" automotrices del país, ganó u$s 765 millones en Sudamérica el año pasado, y la mayor parte de ello provino de Brasil. En la automotriz estadounidense aseguraron que se invertirán en ese país 4.500 millones de reales entre 2011 y 2015.

El mercado automotriz brasileño se expandió 11% el año pasado, ayudado por incentivos fiscales y principalmente por el impulso de una economía rica en recursos, con crédito en expansión y una clase media que crece a gran velocidad. El sector prevé un avance de un dígito elevado ese año, y que continuará esa tendencia en los próximos años.

"Brasil tiene 6,5 habitantes por vehículo; en EE.UU., es 1 o 1,2", señaló Rogelio Golfarb, director institucional de Ford do Brasil. "El potencial de crecimiento es inmenso".


 


DOS MILLONES DE EMPLEOS CREADOS EN 2010, DIJO LULA

BRASILIA, 24 (ANSA) - El presidente brasileño, Luiz Lula da Silva, afirmó hoy que serán creados dos millones de empleos en 2010 y comparó ese dato con la situación en los países desarrollados, donde crece la desocupación.

"Hasta el 30 de abril creamos 962.000 nuevos empleos y estamos trabajando con la hipótesis de llegar a fin de año con la creación de dos millones de empleos" afirmó el mandatario.

"Si continuamos así daremos un salto extraordinario hasta ser uno de los países con menor índice de desempleo" del mundo continuó.

"Todo el mundo perdió muchos puestos de trabajo durante la crisis, y nosotros, gracias a Dios, los aumentamos" consignó el mandatario y ex sindicalista Lula.

"Entré en el sindicalismo en 1969, en la década del 70 teníamos pleno empleo sin libertado política, hoy tenemos total libertad política", destacó.

La tasa de desempleo en las principales capitales es del orden del 7%, según el Insituto Brasileño de Geografía y Estadística.

Lula se reunió hoy con el ministro de Hacienda, Guido Mantega, y el de Planificación, Paulo Bernardo, con quienes analizó la marcha de la economía, que, según un informe presentado hoy, crecerá el 6,4% en 2010.

"Queremos que Brasil alcance el pleno empleo, hace mucho que no teníamos una situación de este tipo" declaró Lula. DFB


 


PIB CRECERA 6,46% EN 2010 PREVE MERCADO FINANCIERO

BRASILIA, 24 (ANSA) - El Producto Interno Bruto (PIB) de Brasil crecerá el 6,46% en este año según un informe del Banco Central, publicado hoy, basado en previsiones de ejecutivos y analistas del mercado.

El Boletín Focus estima que el PIB se expandirá el 6,46 % contra una del 6,30%, formulada en otro informe conocido la semana pasada.

Se trata de la decimoctava previsión consecutiva de crecimiento PIB, que en 2009 se mantuvo estacado.

Si el diagnóstico se confirma será la mayor crecida del PIB desde 1986, cuando fue del 7,4%, según el Instituto Brasileño de Geografía y Estadística.

En 2011, en tanto, la actividad económica avanzará el 4,5 %.

Uno de los sectores más dinámicos en 2010, será la industria, que experimentará un alza del 10,90 %.

El ministro de Hacienda, Guido Mantega, anunció hace dos semanas una reducción de gastos públicos del orden de los 5.500 millones de dólares para frenar la expansión económica y, con ello, evitar el riesgo de una estampida inflacionaria.

Según los cálculos del mercado presentados hoy la inflación será del 5,67 este año, mientras la meta del gobierno es de 4,5%. (ANSA). MRZ


 


Brazil's Consumer Confidence Increases Again In May

MAY 25, 2010, 7:20 A.M. ET

SAO PAULO (Dow Jones)--Brazil's main consumer confidence index increased in May, for the third consecutive month, amid positive outlook for the country's economy, the Getulio Vargas Foundation, or FGV, said Tuesday.

FGV's Consumer Confidence Index, or ICC, increased to 116.1 points from 115.4 points in April. The index runs from 1 to 200 points, with 100 considered neutral.

The figure remains above the historical average of 107 points, according to FGV.

Brazil's economy has proved resilient in the face of the global economic crisis. The country slipped into recession in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. But recovering consumer confidence and rising employment have led to higher retail sales, fueling the nation's recovery.

Brazil's GDP expanded 2% in the fourth quarter of 2009 compared with the third quarter, with economists predicting an expansion of more than 6% in 2010.

The ICC index is based on interviews with 2,000 families in Brazil's seven largest cities. The ICC measures the willingness of families to make purchases of various types of consumer goods, and gauges expectations about employment, income and economic opportunities.


 

-By Rogerio Jelmayer, Dow Jones Newswires; 55-11-3544-7071; rogerio.jelmayer@dowjones.com


 


Brazil Stocks End Lower As Spain Worries Cut Off Rally

MAY 24, 2010, 4:50 P.M. ET

BRASILIA (Dow Jones)--Brazil's Bovespa stocks index lost ground to end lower Monday as worries over financial sector health in Spain cut off hopes for the extension of a rally seen Friday.

The main Sao Paulo stocks index ended 0.6% lower at 59,915 points after ending at 60,259 points Friday. Volume was moderate, with 4.64 billion Brazilian reals ($2.5 billion) in shares changing hands.

With the day's decline, the index is down by 11.3% so far in May and by 12.6% for the year-to-date.

Traders noted the local market began Monday in a volatile mode, swinging between gains and declines as investors sought to evaluate the impact of the latest news out of Europe.

Spain's central bank over the weekend announced that it intervened in the country's CajaSur savings bank to prevent the spread of systemic difficulties that could ensue from overexposure to risky assets. The intervention was followed by the announcement Monday that four other regional Spanish banks would merge to avoid difficulties in their balance sheets.

Alongside those worries were widespread calls for a general strike in Spain in protest of the government's recently announced fiscal adjustments.

The news of financial and social distress coming from Spain re-ignited worries that erupted last week after Germany moved to restrict some trading strategies in an effort to help limit the fallout from Europe's regional fiscal crisis.

The latest developments continued to weigh against the euro, causing a negative impact for key commodities prices and local materials sector shares.

Helping offset the negative mood somewhat, however was talk Monday that China may postpone implementation of monetary policy tightening as a measure to circumvent slowing growth.

By the end of the session, however, the enthusiasm wasn't enough to overcome broader concerns, and most local shares moved lower.

In the materials sector, shares of mining giant Vale (VALE, VALE5.BR) were down 1.2% to BRL39.80 and shares of steelmaker Gerdau (GGB, GGBR4.BR) fell 0.2% to BRL23.75.

In the banking sector, Itau-Unibanco (ITUB, ITUB4.BR) fell 1.7% to BRL32.92 and rival Bradesco bank (BBD, BBDC4.BR) fell 1.0% to BRL29.89.

Elsewhere, state-controlled oil company Petrobras (PBR, PETR4.BR) fell 0.8% to BRL27.15, heavyweight telecom Oi (TNE, TNLP4.BR) rose 1.9% to BRL27.70 and leading airline Tam (TAMM4.BR) ended 1.6% lower at BRL24.61.

All quotes refer to preferred shares.


 


Brazil Real Ends Weaker As Spain Renews Euro Zone Worries

MAY 24, 2010, 4:02 P.M. ET

BRASILIA (Dow Jones)--After brief gains late last week, Brazil's real resumed a weakening trend Monday as banking sector problems in Spain over the weekend renewed investor concerns over the repercussions of fiscal difficulties throughout Europe.

The real ended at BRL1.8660 to the dollar after ending at BRL1.8560 to the dollar on the Brazilian Mercantile and Futures Exchange Wednesday.

Traders noted investors moved back into a defensive stance after Spain's central bank intervened in the CajaSur savings bank over the weekend to prevent the spread of systemic difficulties that could ensue from CajaSur's overexposure to risky assets. Also causing some concern was the announcement Monday that four other regional Spanish banks would merge to shore up difficulties in their balance sheets.

Alongside those worries were widespread calls for a general strike in Spain in protest of the government's planned fiscal adjustments.

The recent difficulties in Spain brought renewed focus to the problems in the Euro region after investors reacted negatively last week to German moves to tighten trading regulations.

Meanwhile, the nervousness regarding Europe's economic outlook continued to have a negative knock-on effect for Brazilian exporters, as key commodities prices tracked the Euro lower.

The concerns over Europe, however, were offset somewhat by Monday by enthusiasm over talk that China may postpone implementation of monetary policy tightening as a measure to circumvent slowing growth.

Locally the focus remained on inflation. Projections for Brazil's IPCA consumer price inflation continued to rise Monday according to a market survey released by the country's central bank. The survey showed projections for Brazil's IPCA consumer price inflation rising to 5.67% in 2010 from 5.54% seen previously.

Brazil's own monetary policy outlook, however, remained unchanged, with analysts projecting a 225 basis point increase for the country's references Selic rate by the end of 2010 to a rate of 11.75% annually.

Brazil's central bank, meanwhile, did its part to weigh in against the local currency buying dollars in a late session spot market auction for BRL1.8641 to the dollar in its ongoing effort to build foreign reserves.

In local rate futures trading trading Monday, rates were slightly lower, with investors showing uncertainty over the impact of turbulence abroad. The rate on the country's most actively traded contract, Jan. 2012, moved to 12.03% from 12.04% at Friday's close.

Brazil's interbank overnight rate, meanwhile, fell to 9.37% from 9.38% Friday.


 


Brazil's Central Bank Buys Dollars In Auction At BRL1.8641

MAY 24, 2010, 3:20 P.M. ET

BRASILIA (Dow Jones)--Brazil's central bank bought U.S. dollars at an auction Monday for BRL1.8641 to the dollar, the bank said.

The central bank didn't reveal the volume of dollars purchased.

Before the auction, at 1900 GMT, the real was trading at BRL1.8610 to the dollar. Following the auction, as of 1915 GMT, the real traded at BRL1.8660.

Brazil's central bank has been purchasing dollars at daily spot market auctions since May 2009 to build foreign reserves after suspending such auctions in September 2008.

As of Friday, Brazil's foreign reserves stood at $249.7 billion.


 


Brazil Stocks Decline Early Tracking Caution Abroad

MAY 24, 2010, 10:09 A.M. ET

BRASILIA (Dow Jones)--Brazil's Bovespa stock index declined slightly in volatile trading early Monday as investors showed caution over renewed signs of turbulence in the financial sector in Europe.

As of 1400 GMT, the main Sao Paulo stocks index declined 0.1% to 60195 points after ending at 60259 points Friday.

Traders noted that investors were showing some continued risk aversion in reaction to Spain's intervention in the CajaSur bank over the weekend and calls for a general strike in that country in protest of fiscal adjustments.

The concerns over Europe were offset somewhat by enthusiasm Monday over talk that China may postpone implementation of monetary-policy tightening as a measure to circumvent slowing growth.

Key Asian markets reacted positively to the speculation, led by a 3.5% advance in Shanghai.

Locally, meanwhile, projections for Brazil's inflation continued to rise Monday, according to a market survey released by the country's central bank. The survey showed projections for Brazil's IPCA consumer-price inflation rising to 5.67% in 2010 from 5.54% seen previously.

Brazil's own monetary-policy outlook, however, remained unchanged, with analysts projecting a 225 basis point increase for the country's reference Selic rate by the end of 2010, to a rate of 11.75% annually.

In early trading Monday, share prices were mixed, reflecting an environment of cautious bargain hunting.

Among materials-sector shares, mining giant Vale (VALE, VALE5.BR) was down 0.2% to 40.20 Brazilian reals ($21.73) and steelmaker Gerdau (GGB, GGB4.BR) fell 0.1% to BRL23.78.

In the banking sector, Banco Itau (ITUB, ITUB4.BR) was down 0.8% to 33.23, and rival Bradesco bank (BBD, BBDC4.BR) was 1.3% lower at BRL29.80.

Elsewhere, shares of heavyweight telecom Oi (TNE) rose 0.2% to BRL27.26, state-controlled oil company Petrobras (PBR) rose 0.3% to BRL27.26, and leading airline Tam (TAMM4.BR) rose 0.7% to BRL25.17.

All price quotes refer to companies' preferred shares.

sexta-feira, 21 de maio de 2010

Clipping Internacional, 21 de maio de 2010


 



 


Brazil's booming economy

Flying too high for safety
A burst of Chinese-level growth cannot be sustained. But it hints at Brazil's new-found strength, and is perfectly timed for the presidential election

May 20th 2010 | SÃO PAULO | From The Economist print edition


NEW skyscrapers are going up along Avenida Faria Lima in the business district of São Paulo. Sales of computers and cars are booming, while a glut of passengers has clogged the main airports. Brazil created 962,000 new formal-sector jobs between January and April—the highest figure for these months since records began in 1992. Everything indicates that over the past six months the economy has grown at an annualised pace of over 10%. Even allowing for an expected slackening, many analysts forecast that growth in 2010 will be 7%—the highest rate since 1986.

The problem is that while it may be growing at Chinese speeds, Brazil is not China. Because it still saves and invests too little, most economists think it is restricted to a speed limit of 5% at the most, if it is not to crash. The growth spurt is partly the result of the stimulus measures taken by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's government when the world financial crisis briefly tipped the country into recession late in 2008. The trouble, say critics, is that much of the extra government spending is turning out to be permanent—and so the economy is starting to resemble a Toyota with the accelerator stuck to the floor.

The strain is showing. Businesses are chasing after scarce skilled labour. Inflation for the 12 months to April reached 5.3%, above the Central Bank's target of 4.5%. Imports are set to top exports this year, for the first time since 2000, and the current-account deficit should widen to 3% of GDP.


The authorities are starting to worry. Last month the Central Bank raised its benchmark Selic interest rate by 0.75%, the first rise in nearly two years. Many economists in São Paulo believe that this one will be followed by others, taking the rate from its low of 8.75% to 13% by next year.

The government's critics say that lax fiscal policy is making the Central Bank's task harder, increasing the risk of the boom ending in a sharp slowdown next year. When he became president in 2003, Lula stuck to the sound fiscal policies he inherited from his predecessor, Fernando Henrique Cardoso. Thanks to faster growth and higher tax revenues, between 2003 and 2008 Lula's government managed to keep public debt in check even while expanding spending. By treating the recession as "a licence to spend", the government is now undermining the credibility it piled up, says Raul Velloso, a public-finance specialist in Brasilia.

Officials share those concerns—up to a point. The government has withdrawn nearly all of the tax breaks it enacted to boost demand during the recession. On May 13th ministers declared that they would shave 10 billion reais ($5.4 billion) from the running costs of the federal government this year. That followed a similar announcement of another 21 billion reais of cuts in March. But this hardly amounts to slamming on the brakes. The cuts are to the generous (and notional) budget approved by Congress. Even if implemented in full, they will merely slow the rate of increase in government spending, keeping it constant or slightly lower as a share of GDP, concedes Nelson Barbosa, a senior finance official.

The government is still injecting money into the economy in two controversial ways. First, the National Development Bank (BNDES), whose loans cost about half the Selic rate, has expanded its lending by almost half. It has been able to do this because the treasury granted it two long-term credits totalling 180 billion reais. Those credits, for which the BNDES has offered IOUs, have led to accusations of creative accounting. While adding to the government's gross debt, they have not driven up the more closely watched figure for public debt, net of assets: at 42.7% of GDP, this is back to its level of mid-2008, and is much lower than the debt burdens of European countries.

Second, the government has jacked up its payroll spending. The number of federal civil servants has increased fairly modestly since 2003 (by around 10%). But they have been treated generously: the total federal wage bill more than doubled in nominal terms between 2003 and 2009, while inflation was less than 50%. Lula has pushed up the minimum wage much faster than inflation too. That has helped to make the income distribution less skewed, and boosted consumer demand. But it has a knock-on effect on pension benefits.

Mr Barbosa insists that faster growth will allow the government to squeeze payroll and pension spending gently over the coming years. The BNDES helped sustain investment when the financial markets seized up. The latest bout of financial turmoil has seen the real depreciate by 5% or so this month. But Brazil's stockpile of international reserves means it is well-placed to withstand market panics. Mr Barbosa says that the critics should look at the long-term trend, under which real interest rates (ie, after inflation) have fallen from up to 20% in 2003 to between 5% and 10%. Once the new monetary squeeze is over they will fall further, he says.

Certainly many Europeans would love to have Brazil's problems. Its economy has acquired underlying strength. Companies are scurrying to satisfy the demand for consumer goods of a rapidly expanding lower-middle class, while China continues to suck in Brazil's exports of raw materials. Productivity is rising. Costs per unit of labour are increasing at only about half the rate of real wages, reckons José Roberto Mendonça de Barros, a consultant and former finance official.

But commodity prices are starting to weaken. Faster growth would be more assured if the government made room for lower interest rates and installed better infrastructure. The next president, elected in October, will have to tackle this. The economy's red-hot start to the election year has increased the chance that it will be Lula's candidate, Dilma Rousseff, who gets the chance to try.


 


Brazil, Turkey and Iran

Not just any deal will do

Have Brazil and Turkey helped solve a brewing nuclear crisis, or made it worse?

May 20th 2010 | From The Economist print edition


TO IRAN'S irrepressible president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the deal was a triumph for the powers of the future over "the tyrant powers [who] belong to the past". Others, tyrannically minded or not, have yet to see whether Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and Turkey's prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan (flanking Mr Ahmadinejad above), really have succeeded in enticing Iran a step in from the cold in its row with the UN Security Council over its nuclear ambitions. Several years of on-off talks (mostly off, at Iran's insistence) between Mr Ahmadinejad's government and six other countries, America, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China, have failed to budge Iran from its insistence that its suspect nuclear work will continue, no matter what.

Under the May 17th deal, Mr Ahmadinejad is to send abroad some of his low-enriched uranium stocks, in return for higher-enriched fuel rods Iran needs to replenish an ageing medical-research reactor. On the face of it, that resembles a bargain Iran had first struck last October with America, Russia, France and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear guardian, before it backed off. But the fear is that, well-meaning as the leaders of Turkey and Brazil may be, Iran is abusing their efforts to get out of a fix.

To those with past experience of Iran's tactics, both timing and terms of the new deal look deeply suspect. Iran is facing a fourth set of UN sanctions. Two days after the Tehran "breakthrough", a draft resolution agreed by the six countries Iran has been refusing to talk to, including previously reluctant Russia and China, was circulated to the rest of the Security Council. That was despite the claim by Turkey's foreign minister that the Tehran deal meant further sanctions were now unwarranted.

If voted through, the new resolution would add more names to a list of individuals, firms and banks sanctioned for their links to Iran's nuclear and missile programmes and slap an arms embargo on heavy weapons. Suspect shipments to and from Iran could be searched. Iran would find it much harder to get foreign uranium for its enrichment machines, which Mr Ahmadinejad claims he set spinning merely to produce under 5% low-enriched uranium for nuclear-power reactors (though Iran has none that can use it), while others suspect it may eventually be used to make the 90%-enriched stuff needed for a bomb.

Iran pooh-poohs sanctions, claiming even new ones won't make it give up its "right" to enrich uranium. But its leaders have been courting other Security Council members, especially Brazil and Turkey. For, whatever their economic impact, widely supported UN sanctions do give the lie to Iran's claims that it is the victim of a Western-inspired plot to deprive it of its right to nuclear energy, rather than being in the dock for what IAEA inspectors report have been serious violations of its nuclear safeguards. Iran also refuses point blank to answer more questions about activities that have little rational explanation except as part of a weapons effort.

Iran thus wants to block or delay a sanctions vote. But even if the October deal had gone through, harsher moves would have remained in play, both because their aim is to get Iran into wider talks than just those over fuel for its research reactor; and because, without pressure, Iran would be free to drag out talks uselessly. The October fuel deal was a gamble: Iran called it an acceptance of its "right" to uranium enrichment. But the rewards, had it chosen to negotiate seriously, were deemed worth the risk.

By shipping two-thirds of its then low-enriched uranium abroad, Iran would have been left, for perhaps six months while it rebuilt stocks, with less uranium in the country than would be needed, with further enrichment, for a breakout to a nuclear bomb. This, it was hoped, might create time for wider talks. More to the point, Russia's offer to enrich the uranium from under 5% to the almost 20% needed for the medical reactor, along with France's readiness to turn it into the needed fuel rods, mean Iran had no excuse to do the higher enrichment work itself. For it is a quirk of uranium enrichment that to get from 20% to 90% takes less effort than making the lesser-enriched stuff in the first place.

If a deal was worth trying then, surely it is worth trying now? But much has changed. Iran's stock of low-enriched uranium is bigger: only about half of it would be needed to produce the equivalent fuel load for the medical reactor. Iran could have a full bomb's-worth on hand again in no time. Earlier this year, Iran started its own 20% enrichment and insists that this will continue. That wipes out the hoped for non-proliferation gain, and may be a deal-breaker.

Meanwhile the terms of the new accord are vague. Mr Ahmadinejad is to set out his ideas to the IAEA within days. But then he can take all the time he likes to haggle over details with America, France, Russia and the IAEA. Under the old deal, the uranium would have gone directly to Russia, then France for reworking. Under the new one, Turkey will take custody of it. But Turkey has no way to enrich it or make it into fuel. Does Iran expect to get the 20% enriched fuel rods from another source, while its own uranium is under Turkish guard? Also, under the deal with Turkey and Brazil, Mr Ahmadinejad can decide whether the deal is going as he likes. If it isn't, Turkey must hand back his uranium forthwith.

For those trying to talk Iran out of potentially weapons-usable work, this seems to get them nowhere. But it could leave the Security Council split and make an end to the stand-off with Iran harder. Mr Ahmadinejad would be the winner.


 


Brazilian telecoms

Get off the line

Portugal Telecom and Spain's Telefónica squabble over Brazil

May 20th 2010 | PARIS | From The Economist print edition

"THE scale of Portugal Telecom is an asset for the country. We don't want a small company, we want a big one." So pronounced Portugal's prime minister, José Sócrates, this week, defending Portugal Telecom's rejection of a hostile bid from Spain's Telefónica for its share of Vivo, a fast-growing Brazilian mobile operator. Zeinal Bava, the boss of the Portuguese firm, added a warning that leaving Brazil would mean "amputating Portugal Telecom's future".

Yet such surgery may prove hard to resist, given Telefónica's financial clout. The Spanish firm offered €5.7 billion ($7.2 billion) in cash for the bit of Vivo that it does not own. That is equivalent to over 80% of the total market value of Portugal Telecom itself.

Nine years ago, the two Iberian firms launched a united assault on Brazil, forming a joint venture from seven assorted mobile units that they already controlled. The resulting entity, Vivo, now has the largest share of a valuable and expanding market. With 52m subscribers, Vivo has a substantial mobile business and contributes 46% of Portugal Telecom's revenues.

Although it is growing, the Brazilian market is also proving to be viciously competitive. Three main groups are battling for share in mobile and fixed lines: as well as the Spanish and Portuguese with Vivo (and Telefónica's other assets), there are Oi, a local player, and América Móvil, part of the empire of Mexico's Carlos Slim. Success will probably depend on consolidation and better integration of mobile and fixed-line units. Oi and América Móvil have already tried, but now Telefónica would like to merge Vivo with Telesp, its fixed-line operator. The resulting entity would cut costs and could offer customers bundled telecoms packages. Telefónica also needs to bolster Telesp, which is struggling as customers dump fixed lines for mobiles.

The partnership between Portugal Telecom and Telefónica soured in 2006-07 when the Spanish giant unexpectedly backed a Portuguese firm, Sonaecom, in a failed hostile bid for the national operator. Telefónica's goal then, as now, was to push Portugal Telecom out of Vivo, which it had planned to buy from a victorious Sonaecom. Things have quickly turned nasty this time. Last week Telefónica's finance director attacked Portugal Telecom for rejecting its bid without consulting shareholders, which he said raised questions about the firm's corporate governance. The Portuguese say that Telefónica is cynically taking advantage of the euro-zone financial crisis, which has reduced Portugal Telecom's market capitalisation.

If, as expected, Telefónica raises its bid for Vivo in the coming weeks, Portugal Telecom may be obliged to let its shareholders decide. Telefónica itself owns 10% of Portugal Telecom's shares, but may not be allowed to vote on the matter. A hard core of mainly Portuguese allies hold about 30% of the shares and foreign investors the rest. Since Telefónica's offer is so high relative to the value of Portugal Telecom, analysts reckon the Spaniards could even make an offer for the whole firm if its bid for Vivo goes nowhere. Another option for Telefónica could be to bid for TIM Brasil, a mobile firm owned by Telecom Italia, and add it to Vivo.

However bitterly the Portuguese resent the attempt to push them out of Brazil, resolving ownership of Vivo is just one episode in a far more important battle—that between Telefónica and América Móvil right across Latin America. Telefónica's Movistar subsidiary is expected to win additional wireless spectrum and a stronger position in Mexico, América Móvil's home market, later this year. América Móvil would not welcome a merger of Vivo and Telesp, which would strengthen Telefónica's base in Brazil.

Could Mr Slim again be the one to ride to the rescue? He stepped in last time around when the Spaniards had seemed poised to seize full control of Vivo, in 2006-07, eventually acquiring a 5% stake in Portugal Telecom and helping to defeat the combined assault of Sonaecom and Telefónica. Mr Bava, who is now on a whirlwind tour of foreign shareholders, could yet conclude that he should be dropping in on Mexico City.


 


Economic and financial indicators

May 20th 2010
From The Economist print edition

In America, the number of new houses on which construction began rose to an annual pace of 672,000 in April, 5.8% higher than in March. April's rate of housing starts was 40.9% higher than a year earlier.

The inflation rate in the euro area was 1.5% in April, up from 1.4% in March, and much higher than the 0.6% recorded in April 2009. But a measure of inflation that excludes food and fuel prices, which are relatively volatile, fell to 0.7% in April from 0.9% in March.

Inflation in Britain rose to 3.7% in April from 3.4% a month earlier. April's inflation rate was the highest since November 2008.

America bucked the rich-country trend of rising inflation. Prices fell by 0.1% in April from the previous month on a seasonally adjusted basis, making it the first month since March 2009 when prices have declined month-on-month. The annual inflation rate slowed to 2.2% in April from 2.3% in March. Excluding food and energy prices, core American inflation was 0.9% in April, the lowest in 49 years.

Spain's GDP in the first quarter rose by 0.1% compared with the previous three-month period, but was 1.3% lower than in the first quarter of 2009.

Japan's GDP grew at an annual rate of 4.9% in the three months to the end of March, beating growth of 3.8% during the previous quarter. Industrial growth in March from the previous month was revised upwards, from 0.3% to 1.2%.


 


CEO turnover rate

May 20th 2010 | From The Economist print edition

According to Booz & Company, a consultancy, 14.3% of the world's 2,500 biggest publicly listed companies got new bosses in 2009. This was marginally lower than 2008's turnover rate of 14.4%. The proportion of chief executives forced from office fell to 3.3% last year, its lowest level since 2003, and down from 5.1% in 2008. The financial sector saw the most bloodletting, with 5.2% of bosses fired and a turnover rate of 17.2%. Between 2008 and last year, the turnover of chief executives fell by 2.4 percentage points to 12.4% in North America, and rose slightly in Europe, to 15.2%. But Asian companies outside Japan have become increasingly prone to changing bosses. Turnover was 9.2% in 2007, but rose to 15.3% last year.


 


Platinum and palladium

May 20th 2010 | From The Economist print edition

According to Johnson Matthey, a precious-metals trader, global demand for platinum fell by 11.9% in 2009, to 7.04m ounces. Supplies of newly mined platinum also declined in 2009, by 20,000 ounces to 5.92m ounces. But these supplies—the bulk of them from South Africa, the world's largest producer of the stuff—were supplemented by 1.41m ounces of recycled platinum, ensuring that there was 285,000 ounces more around than was demanded. There was excess supply in the market for palladium, too. Demand declined by 6.3% to 7.7m ounces, 760,000 ounces less than global supply. Demand for platinum fell in most parts of the world, except in China, where it rose by over 50% to 2,210 ounces.


 


How hot is too hot in Brazil?

May 20, 2010 9:56pm

The word "overheating" dominates talk about Brazil's economy these days. Inflation and growth forecasts are being revised upwards, the central bank is widely expected to continue raising interest rates and the government last week announced R$10bn in spending cuts.

But Carlos Maggioli, the head of sales and trading at Itaú BBA, says that even if Brazil's economy grows as fast as 9 per cent, the threat of overheating won't kick in until growth accelerates past India and China.

If growth goes up to 10 per cent, "then you will see overheating," Mr Maggioli told beyondbrics in an interview at the investment bank's annual conference in New York. But that's unlikely, he added, because an infrastructure bottleneck will keep growth in the range of 5 to 9 per cent.

"The economics look extremely strong. I don't think the stock market is pricing that right now," he said.

Itaú Unibanco recently raised its GDP growth forecast to 7.5 per cent in 2010 from 6.5 per cent, and Guilherme da Nobrega, an Itaú economist, told Bloomberg yesterday that the estimate may be raised to as much as 8.5 per cent.

Such fast growth would likely put a lot of pressure on prices, since Brazil's potential or non-inflationary growth rate is seen by most economists at between 4 and 5 per cent a year. Earlier this month, Guido Mantega, the finance minister, told the FT's Jonathan Wheatley that he government has set a 6 per cent limit on growth.

Low-income housing boom

As for what's driving growth, Mr Maggioli points to a shift in demand to the lower end of Brazil's system of economic classification – the D and E classes, who earn less than R$1,115 (US$598) a month, according to the Getulio Vargas Foundation.

This is "a consumption trend we haven't seen in the last 20 years," Mr Maggioli said, and is fueling the low-income housing sector.

Housing credit is expanding rapidly: Caixa Econômica Federal, the government-controlled savings bank, made R$45bn in home loans in 2009 – R$25bn more than in 2008 and R$20bn more than it had projected

Add to that the 2m low-income homes scheduled to be built by 2014 through the federal "Mi Casa, Mi Vida" housing programme, and it's not hard to see why real estate is attracting attention.

Indeed, Bloomberg reports today that billionaire investor Sam Zell's Equity International is stepping up its investment in Brazilian property to the tune of $500m.

"Our enthusiasm for Brazil could not be higher," [Equity International chief executive Gary] Garrabrant, who co-founded Equity International with Zell in 1999, said in a May 18 interview in Sao Paulo. "You've got this local demand that's unparalleled."


 


Rising powers do not want to play by the west's rules

By Philip Stephens

Published: May 20 2010 22:49 | Last updated: May 20 2010 22:49


There are two ways of looking at the efforts of Turkey and Brazil to resolve the dispute about Iran's nuclear programme. One dismisses the initiative as collusion with Tehran's attempt to derail a fourth round of United Nations sanctions; another welcomes a recognition in Ankara and Brasilia that rising powers have a stake in sustaining a rules-based global order.

Unsurprisingly, the default response in the west has been the former. Reactions in Washington, London and elsewhere to the agreement brokered by Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Brazil's Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ranged along a spectrum from condescension to intense irritation. Ankara and Brasilia, at best, were dupes.

The bargain struck by the two leaders with Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, if implemented, would see Iran transfer to Turkish custody a large proportion of its stockpile of enriched uranium. In return, Tehran would be supplied with the more highly-enriched material used in medical isotopes. The risk of an Iranian bomb would be reduced, while Tehran would retain what it sees as a sovereign right to mastery of the nuclear fuel cycle.

There is nothing novel about the idea. It is modelled on an offer made last autumn by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. The difference is that this first proposal envisaged the Iranian uranium would be sent to Russia.

The latest plan raises plenty of legitimate questions. Among other things it does not tell us what Iran proposes to do with the rest of its uranium stockpile and why it is continuing to produce more. Tehran has also yet to explain why it is now enriching to a higher concentration.

The timing of the deal raises the justified suspicion that Iran's primary objective is to upset the US-led move towards further UN sanctions. During many years of negotiations with the west, Tehran has hardly been subtle in its tactics: the pattern has been one of apparent concessions at moments of pressure followed by lengthy prevarication and enrichment as usual. On a generous interpretation, one western diplomat told me, Mr Erdogan and Mr Lula da Silva were naive.

Against this background, the US, France and Britain have unveiled their plans for the latest sanctions – this time directed at Iran's Revolutionary Guard – with obvious satisfaction. Turkey and Brazil might think their deal had abrogated the need for further punitive measures, but China and Russia had been persuaded otherwise.

Perhaps I am overly cynical but I detect a certain petulance here. Turkey and Brazil have temporary seats on the Security Council, and it is as if the permanent members are affronted the two nations should presume to strike out on their own.

The Iranian nuclear issue, you could almost hear diplomats saying, is an argument that has to be settled by the established powers. If others want to help that is fine – but they should do so by backing the west's plan rather than coming up with crackpot ideas of their own.

There are several reasons why this is short-sighted. Most obviously the permanent five have got just about nowhere so far. Even those arguing that sanctions are the only way to coerce Iran into toeing the UN line do not really believe the measures can work on their own. If Tehran really has decided to build the bomb, a squeeze on the Revolutionary Guard will not change its mind.

It is evident, too, that in the event that the present regime were to change course and seek an accommodation on its nuclear programme, ways would have to be found to ensure it was not seen as capitulating to the great, and lesser, Satans of the west. A deal struck with a neighbouring Islamic state might – and I emphasise the might – be a route out of the impasse.

For Mr Erdogan's government the attempt to broker a deal is a natural extension of Ankara's active regional diplomacy. The last few years have seen a marked rise in both Turkey's economic prosperity and its political confidence. As France, Germany and others have found reasons to exclude it from the European Union, Turkey has turned eastwards.

Ankara's rising stature in the region has been based on the brilliantly simple proposition that nations that want to project influence should start by fixing their own disputes. Mr Erdogan has settled long-running arguments with Syria and Iraq and sought to lower tensions in the Caucasus.

The neighbourhood problem-solving has not been universally successful but it has been sufficiently so to turn Turkey into a big regional player. Mr Erdogan's government now shows the political confidence that comes with understanding that it has opened up options for itself beyond frustrating and fruitless negotiations in Brussels about the terms under which it might at some point qualify as a "European" power. Here, I think, lies a source of the irritation in Washington and elsewhere about the latest initiative.

The off-stated ambition of western governments is that the world's rising powers should bear some of the burden of safeguarding international security and prosperity. The likes of China, India and, dare one say, Turkey and Brazil, are beneficiaries of a rules-based global order and, as such, should be prepared to contribute. They should, in a phrase coined some years ago by Robert Zoellick, act as stakeholders in the system.

Seen from Ankara or Brasilia, or indeed from Beijing or New Delhi, there is an important snag in this argument. They are not being invited to craft a new international order but rather to abide by the old (western) rules. As I heard one Chinese scholar remark this week, it is as if the rising nations have been offered seats at a roulette table only on the strict understanding that the west retains ownership of the casino.

As it happens, the US understands better than Europeans the shifting distribution of power. Barack Obama's administration has been thinking hard about the new geopolitical geometry, even as Europe remains trapped in its anxiety to cling on to the old Euro-atlantic order.

In its excellent exercise in crystal-ball gazing, Global Trends 2025, the US National Intelligence Council presciently included a scenario in which Brazil acts as a mediator at a moment of crisis in the Middle East. Imagining a different future, though, is not the same as coming to terms with it. If the west wants global order, it has to get used to others having a say in making the rules.


 


Turkish PM to visit Brazil as UN mulls Iran sanctions

BRASILIA - The leaders of the two UN Security Council countries holding out against new sanctions on Iran, Turkey and Brazil, are to meet next week, diplomats from both countries told AFP.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will make a three-day visit to Brazil from next Wednesday, during which he will see Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, they said.

Erdogan and Lula this week struck a deal with Iran over its nuclear program they thought would defuse a push by the United States to impose fresh sanctions on Tehran in the UN Security Council.

But Washington and its allies dismissed Tehran's agreement to send around half its stock of low-enriched uranium to Turkey in exchange for better-enriched nuclear fuel.

On Tuesday, the United States submitted a UN resolution calling for an international clampdown on Iranian banks, shipping and business dealings that could be linked to its nuclear activities.

Brazil and Turkey on Wednesday issued a joint letter demanding their agreement with Iran be considered, and that the sanctions push be dropped.

The countries are two of the 10 non-permanent Security Council members without the veto power of the five permanent members over resolutions. The resolution needs nine votes in the 15-seat Security Council chamber to pass.

Erdogan is to be in Sao Paulo next Wednesday to inaugurate a new Turkish consulate and speak at a business conference, according to the diplomats.

On Thursday, he was to see Lula over a working lunch in Brasilia.

On Friday, the Turkish leader was to attend a UN-sponsored Global Forum on the Alliance of Civilizations, a conference bringing together Western and Muslim nations, in Rio.


 


 


America Moves the Goalposts

By ROGER COHEN| Published: May 20, 2010


 

NEW YORK — John Limbert, once a U.S. hostage in Tehran, now charged with Iranian affairs at the State Department, has given a good description of the caricatures that bedevil American-Iranian non-relations.

Americans see Iranians as "devious, mendacious, fanatical, violent and incomprehensible." Iranians, in turn, see Americans as "belligerent, sanctimonious, Godless and immoral, materialistic, calculating," not to mention bullying and exploitive.

That's Ground Zero in the most traumatized relationship on earth and the most tantalizing. Tantalizing because Iran and the United States are unnatural enemies with plenty they might agree on if they ever broke the ice. Limbert, a bridge-builder, has spent half a lifetime trying to deliver that message. It never flies. Poisonous history gets in the way. So do those that profit from poison.

If all the mistrust needed further illustration, it has just been provided by the Brazilian-Turkish deal on Iran's low enriched uranium (LEU), the peevish U.S. reaction to it, and the apparent determination of the Great Powers, led by the Obama administration, to burrow deeper into failure.

I believed Obama was ready to think anew on Iran. It seems not. Presidents must lead on major foreign policy initiatives, not be bullied by domestic political considerations, in this case incandescent Iran ire on the Hill in an election year.

More on that later, but first let's take a cold look at the Brazilian and Turkish leaders' achievement in Tehran, how it relates to an earlier American near-deal, and what all this says about a world undergoing significant power shifts.

I'll take the last point first. Brazil and Turkey represent the emergent post-Western world. It will continue to emerge; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton should therefore be less trigger-happy in killing with faint praise the "sincere efforts" of Brasilia and Ankara.

The West's ability to impose solutions to global issues like Iran's nuclear program has unraveled. America, engaged in two inconclusive wars in Muslim countries, cannot afford a third. The first decade of the 21st century has delineated the limits of U.S. power: It is great but no longer determinative.

Lots of Americans, including the Tea Party diehards busy baying at wolves, are angry about this. They will learn that facts are facts.

Speaking of facts, I must get a little technical here. Iran has been producing, under International Atomic Energy Agency inspection, LEU (enriched to about 5 percent). It is this LEU that would have to be turned into bomb-grade uranium (over 90 percent) if Iran were to produce a nuclear weapon. The idea behind the American deal in Geneva last October was to get a big chunk of LEU out of Iran to build confidence, create some negotiating space, and remove material that could get subverted. In exchange, Iran would later get fuel rods for a medical research reactor in Tehran.

Iran, doing the bazaar routine, said yes, maybe and no, infuriating Obama. Iran now wanted the LEU stored on Iranian soil under I.A.E.A. control, phased movement of the LEU to this location, and a simultaneous fuel rod exchange. Forget it, Obama said.

Well, Turkey and Brazil have now restored the core elements of the October deal: a single shipment of the 1,200 kilograms of LEU to a location (Turkey) outside Iran and a one-year gap — essential for broader negotiations to begin — between this Iranian deposit in escrow and the import of the fuel rods.

And what's the U.S. response? To pursue "strong sanctions" (if no longer "crippling") against Iran at the United Nations; and insist now on a prior suspension of enrichment that was not in the October deal (indeed this was a core Obama departure from Bush doctrine).

Obama could instead have said: "Pressure works! Iran blinked on the eve of new U.N. sanctions. It's come back to our offer. We need to be prudent, given past Iranian duplicity, but this is progress. Isolation serves Iranian hard-liners."

No wonder Ahmet Davutoglu, the Turkish foreign minister, is angry. I believe him when he says Obama and U.S. officials encouraged Turkey earlier this year to revive the deal: "What they wanted us to do was give the confidence to Iran to do the swap. We have done our duty."

Yes, Turkey has. I know, the 1,200 kilograms now represents a smaller proportion of Iran's LEU than in October and it's no longer clear that the fuel rods will come from the conversion of the LEU in escrow. But that's small potatoes when you're trying to build a tenuous bridge between "mendacious" Iranians and "bullying" Americans in the interests of global security.

The French and Chinese reactions — cautious support — made sense. The American made none, or did only in the light of the strong Congressional push for "crushing" sanctions. Further sanctions will not change Iran's nuclear behavior; negotiations might. I can only hope the U.S. bristling was an opening gambit.

Last year, at the United Nations, Obama called for a new era of shared responsibilities. "Together we must build new coalitions that bridge old divides," he declared. Turkey and Brazil responded — and got snubbed. Obama has just made his own enlightened words look empty.


 


Zell's Firm Raising $500 Million for Brazil Property (Update4)

May 20 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire investor Sam Zell's Equity International is seeking to raise about $500 million to step up investment in Brazilian real estate, betting interest rate increases will fail to stem demand as the economy grows at the fastest pace in two decades.

The firm will invest as much as two-thirds of the money in Brazilian companies tied to the residential and commercial property industries and the rest in other countries outside the U.S., Chief Executive Officer Gary Garrabrant said. The new funds will bring the Chicago-based company's total invested capital to about $2 billion.

"Our enthusiasm for Brazil could not be higher," Garrabrant, who co-founded Equity International with Zell in 1999, said in a May 18 interview in Sao Paulo. "You've got this local demand that's unparalleled."

Rising incomes among Brazil's burgeoning middle class will ensure that a cycle of rate increases won't suppress housing demand, Garrabrant, 53, said. The economy will grow 6.3 percent this year, according to a central bank survey published this week. Brazilians' average monthly income has risen close to 40 percent in the past five years to about 1,400 reais, according to the census bureau.

Zell is expanding in Brazil after Equity International sold part of its stake in Gafisa SA, the country's second-largest homebuilder by revenue, last week. The BM&FBovespa Real Estate index tumbled 23 percent this year through yesterday as policy makers lifted the benchmark interest rate in April for the first time since 2008.

Gafisa Stake

Selling Gafisa shares doesn't signal that Equity International is bearish on Brazilian real estate, Garrabrant said. The firm sold the equivalent of about 18 million Gafisa common shares, worth $123 million based on May 12 closing prices, and now holds 30.1 million, or 7.2 percent of the total, according to a May 13 statement from Gafisa.

Equity International bought a 32 percent stake in the builder for $50 million in 2005 and Garrabrant remains the Sao Paulo-based company's chairman.

"This is, for 10 years, what we do: we invest in businesses," he said. "And then at appropriate points in time we'll monetize our position. It doesn't mean we have any less enthusiasm for Gafisa."

Brazilian homebuilders rallied today in Sao Paulo trading for the first time in six days. MRV Engenharia & Participacoes SA led gains, surging 7.6 percent to 10.79 reais while Gafisa rose 3.1 percent to 10.26 reais.

'Battle-Tested'

Garrabrant said Equity International is not concerned about growth prospects in "battle-tested" Brazil as Europe's debt crisis stokes speculation the global recovery will falter.

"This is nothing compared to what took place in past decades," he said. Brazilian inflation peaked at more than 6,800 percent in 1990, while in mid-May this year it was at 5.26 percent, the government's statistics agency said today.

Brazilian builders are inexpensive compared with "overvalued" U.S. real-estate companies, Garrabrant said. The BM&FBovespa Real Estate gauge traded at nine times earnings yesterday, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

"There are no constraints to growth for the homebuilding sector," he said. "Fundamentals are way ahead of share prices. It's natural that interest rates will rise in the short term."

Higher Rates

The Selic rate was increased to 9.5 percent on April 28 and policy makers may push it to 10.25 percent next month, according to the median estimate in a central bank survey.

Garrabrant said Brazil's real-estate industry will benefit from economic and political changes. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has helped lift 19 million people out of poverty and more than doubled the monthly minimum wage to 510 reais since taking office in 2003. The government's "My House My Life" program is funding the construction of 2 million homes for low- income families by 2014.

The nation's middle class last year increased to 53 percent of the population of 200 million from 42 percent in 2002, Finance Minister Guido Mantega said last month.

At least 1.5 million new households are formed in Brazil each year while builders produce about half that number of housing units, Garrabrant said.

Equity International may invest in Colombia for the first time with its new $500 million fund, the firm's fifth, Garrabrant said. President Alvaro Uribe has boosted investor confidence, he said, by cutting the murder and kidnapping rates since taking office in 2002.

Demand in Colombia

Colombia has "great demand" for affordable and middle- income housing, he said.

The firm is also looking at opportunities in China and "frontier markets" including Vietnam, Indonesia and Morocco. Equity International sold its investments in Ukraine and Venezuela because of political risk, Garrabrant said. In 2008, it sold its holding in Desarrolladora Homex SAB, now Mexico's largest homebuilder.

Garrabrant, who began his career in the real-estate division at First Chicago Bank, and Zell created their company to invest in real-estate businesses outside the U.S. Zell three years ago sold his Equity Office Properties Trust for $39 billion just as commercial property prices were peaking. He also orchestrated a buyout of media company Tribune Co.

Beyond Gafisa, Equity International holds a stake in BR Malls Participacoes SA, Brazil's biggest owner of shopping malls, and bought an 8.5 percent stake in Brazilian Finance & Real Estate Participacoes SA last year to develop the country's mortgage market.

"There are less than 400,000 mortgages in Brazil -- I think there are 400,000 mortgages on the Upper East Side of Manhattan," Garrabrant said. "Will the Brazilians catch up? No question."

--Editors: Alan Mirabella, Lester Pimentel


 


Trichet's Pain Is Meirelles's Gain as Rates Decline (Update2)

May 20 (Bloomberg) -- The debt crisis confounding European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet is helping his Brazilian counterpart Henrique Meirelles tame inflation expectations in Latin America's biggest economy.

Yields on Brazil's interest rate-futures contracts due in January have fallen 25 basis points, or 0.25 percentage point, to 10.95 percent today from a 15-month high on May 3. The yield has dropped five straight days, the longest stretch since January, as commodities slid and prospects that global growth will slow led traders to bet Meirelles needs fewer rate increases to curb inflation.

"The sharp decline in commodity prices for the first time makes people think that the external environment is going to slow the local economy down to a certain extent," said Guillermo Osses, who helps oversee $50 billion in emerging- market assets at Newport Beach, California-based Pacific Investment Management Co., manager of the world's biggest bond fund. "People are starting to think that maybe we're not going to have that much tightening."

Traders have trimmed their year-end expectation for benchmark borrowing costs to about 12 percent from about 12.75 percent at the end of April, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Meirelles, 64, lifted the overnight rate 75 basis points last month to 9.5 percent, the first increase since 2008, to cool an economy that analysts forecast will grow at its fastest pace in two decades this year.

Commodities Rout

Commodities, which make up 41 percent of Brazilian exports, plunged 12 percent since mid-April to a seven-month low as the $1 trillion rescue package arranged by European policy makers failed to reverse a jump in borrowing costs for Greece, Spain and Portugal, according to the UBS Bloomberg CMCI raw materials index. Trichet, 67, is leading an effort by central banks in the region to buy the governments' bonds.

Europe is Brazil's largest export market, buying more than 20 percent of its overseas sales, according to government data. About 55 percent of foreign direct investment in Brazil in the past three years came from Europe, according to Barclays Plc.

"The crisis could be more wide-spread and longer-lasting, the global growth could be softer, and there's repercussions for domestic activity as well," said Marcelo Salomon, an economist with Barclays in Sao Paulo. "There's stress on the rate market as people reassess the total amount of tightening."

Salomon forecasts the central bank will raise the overnight rate to 11.75 percent by August and leave it at that level through year-end.

Credit-Default Swaps

The extra yield investors demand to hold Brazilian dollar bonds instead of U.S. Treasuries widened 14 basis points today to 244. The gap is within five basis points of a three-month high reached May 6 on concern Greece's debt crisis is deepening.

The cost of credit-default swaps to protect against a default on Brazilian debt for five years rose two basis points to 142 yesterday, according to data compiled by CMA DataVision. Credit-default swaps pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent should a government or company fail to adhere to its debt agreements.

Brazil's real sank 3 percent against the dollar today, marking its sixth straight day of declines, the longest losing streak since October 2008. The real has dropped 7.4 percent this year after soaring 33 percent in 2009.

Europe's debt turmoil will only have a "marginal" effect on Brazil and policy makers will have to raise the benchmark overnight rate as much as 350 basis points to "re-anchor" inflation expectations, said Paulo Vieira da Cunha, a former central bank director who is now a partner at Tandem Global Partners LLC in New York.

Spending Cuts

Banco Central do Brasil said the European crisis will be taken into account in future policy decisions, according to the minutes of its April 27-28 meeting published May 6.

Central bankers "made it very clear that any worsening of the fiscal situation in the euro zone could affect the tightening," said Marcelo Saddi Castro, chief investment officer at SulAmerica Investimentos, who manages 15 billion reais in Sao Paulo.

A government plan unveiled last week to cut spending by 10 billion reais is also helping drive down yields on rate futures, Salomon said. Finance Minister Guido Mantega said May 13 that the spending cuts are "a strong and quick tool" to curb growth and inflation.

'Deflationary Forces'

Analysts predict the economy will expand 6.3 percent this year, the fastest pace since 1986, according to a central bank survey published this week. Itau Unibanco Holding SA, Brazil's biggest bank by market value, may raise its growth estimate to as much as 8.5 percent from 7.5 percent, economist Guilherme da Nobrega said yesterday in an interview in New York.

Analysts in the survey held their 2011 inflation forecast at 4.8 percent for a fifth straight week while raising their 2010 prediction to 5.54 percent from 5.5 percent. The central bank targets an annual rate of 4.5 percent.

A government report today showed that consumer prices rose 0.63 percent in the April 14-to-May 13 period, more than the 0.58 percent median forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists. The annual inflation rate climbed to 5.3 percent, above the central bank's 4.5 percent target.

"Inflation is coming to the forefront much faster than expected, but the debt crisis unleashes deflationary forces," said Michael Roche, an emerging-market strategist at MF Global Holdings Ltd., a New York-based broker. "The market is building a premium for a softer tightening environment."


 


Brazil Mid-May Inflation Quickens More Than Expected (Update1)

May 20 (Bloomberg) -- Brazil's inflation quickened more than expected in the month through mid-May, cementing expectations that the central bank will raise the benchmark interest rate 0.75 percent for a second straight meeting to prevent the economy from overheating.

Consumer prices as measured by the IPCA-15 index rose 0.63 percent in the April 14 to May 13 period, up from 0.48 last month, the government's statistics agency said today. The index rose more than the median estimate of a 0.58 percent rise in a Bloomberg survey of 38 economists.

Brazil's fastest economic expansion in more than two decades is stoking inflation and prompting policy makers to raise borrowing costs after keeping the Selic at a record low for nine months to fuel growth. Policy makers will increase the benchmark rate for a second straight meeting in June in a bid to rein in consumer prices that have exceeded the government's 4.5 percent target in each month this year.

"This means monetary policy tightening is due to continue over the course of this year," said Marcelo Salomon, an economist with Barclays Plc in Sao Paulo.

The yield on the interest rate future contract maturing January 2012, the most traded today on Sao Paulo's BM&F exchange, fell two basis points to 12.14 percent at 8:45 a.m. New York time. The real dropped 2.7 percent to 1.8773 per U.S. dollar.

'Vigorous' Action

Brazil's central bank became the first in Latin America to raise rates in more than a year on April 28, increasing the benchmark Selic rate to 9.5 percent from a record low 8.75 percent.

"We maintain our view that there are going to be three more 75 basis-point movements, taking the Selic rate to 11.75 percent," Salomon said.

Inflation in the 12 months through mid-May quickened to 5.26 percent, up from 5.22 percent a month earlier, the national statistic agency said.

Traders are betting the central bank will raise the Selic by 0.78 percentage point at their June 8-9 meeting, according to Bloomberg estimates based on interest rate futures contracts.

Central bank President Henrique Meirelles said April 25 that policy makers are prepared to take "vigorous" action to prevent the economy from overheating.

To cool the economy in tandem with higher lending rates, Finance Minister Guido Mantega this month said the government will cut 10 billion reais ($5.4 billion) in spending.

V-Shaped Rebound

Key indicators show Latin America's largest economy is rebounding strongly from the global financial crisis. Retail sales increased 15.7 percent in March from a year earlier, while industrial production grew 19.7 percent.

Itau-Unibanco Holding SA may raise its 2010 growth forecast to as high as 8.5 percent, the bank's economist, Guilherme da Nobrega, said yesterday. Brazil's biggest bank by market value last week raised its forecast for growth to 7.5 percent this year and 4.8 percent in 2011.

Gross domestic product will expand 6.3 percent in 2010, a central bank weekly survey of about 100 economists published May 17 showed. That would be the fastest expansion since 1986, when the economy grew 7.49 percent.

The same survey shows economists expect the central bank to raise the Selic by 75 basis points to 10.25 percent next month and 11.75 percent by year-end.


 


Euro fiscal crisis and local inflation tarnish Brazilian glitter

Brazil's Bovespa stocks index and the Real lost ground for a sixth straight session Thursday as investors continued to sell local assets given the depressed global economic outlook following on fears about the Euro fiscal crisis and disappointing data on the health of the US economy.

Friday, May
21st
2010 - 03:40 UTC

Bovespa was down 2.5% at 58,192 points after ending at 59,689 points Wednesday. With Thursday decline, the index has reached its lowest level since Sept. 9 and is down by 15.2% so far this year.

The Brazilian currency Real also slipped 1% ending at 1.861 to the US dollar.

A sustained weakening of the Euro brought continued negative impact for Brazilian materials sector shares, as prices of key commodities continued recent declines threatening the country's export. Making matters worse the US Labor Department on Thursday reported jobless claims rose 25,000 in the week ending May 15 to 471,000.

Locally, the market pondered a continued acceleration in inflation. Brazil's IBGE statistics institute reported IPCA consumer price inflation advanced by 0.63% in early May from 0.48% in April. The figure brought 12-month inflation to 5.26%.

The surging inflation has helped stoke concerns Brazil's central bank will be forced to take a hard line in a recently begun monetary-policy tightening cycle. Brazil's Central bank raised the country's reference Selic rate 75 basis points last month to 9.5% annually. The hike was the Central bank first in nearly 20 months.

According to market estimates, the Selic rate is seen rising about 225 basis points by the end of this year to 11.75% annually.

However next October Brazil goes to the polls to elect a new president and policy makers could be reluctant to press on the brakes too hard or suddenly.

While Brazilian economic growth prospects appear to remain good this year, with forecasts above 7%, analysts note local markets still are a ripe target for capital withdrawals by international players seeking to send funds to safe-haven investments elsewhere.

To that effect former president of the Central Bank Arminio Fraga warned Brazil isn't prepared for economic growth of 6% or 7% a year because of inflationary pressures and infrastructure "bottlenecks".

In an interview with O Estado de Sao Paulo Arminio Fraga said all the "mature" global economies are in a "very worrying fiscal situation" and the financial crisis "may worsen".
Fraga said the situation won't lead to the end of the Euro unless there is a "gigantic collective error in economic policy".

Earlier this week the Central Bank index of economic activity said the Brazilian economy was up 2.38% in the first quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 and 9.84% over the first quarter a year ago.

Finance Minister Guido Mantega said Wednesday that the Brazilian economy would generate two million formal jobs in 2010 after having created almost one million in the first four months, almost the same as in the whole of 2009.


 


Petrobras leading Latinamerican corporation based on sales volume
Petrobras, Brazil's government managed oil and gas corporation rates as the Latinamerican corporation with the largest volume of sales, according to consultants Economática. The top ranked include six Brazilian companies, three Mexican and one from Colombia.


 

Thursday, May
20th
2010

Petrobras sales in 2009 reached the equivalent of 104.9 billion US dollars followed by Mexico's America Movil with 30.2 billion. Two other Brazilian corporations, Vale Doce linked to the mining industry and petrochemical Ultrapar figured in third and fourth places with 27.8 billion and 20.7 billion.

Consultants Economática rated the top 30 Latinamerican on sales volumes based on the corporate balance sheet of last year from 776 Latinamerican corporations.

Sixth rates Wal-Mart Mexico with sales of 20.69 billion US dollars followed by Brazil's meats' giant JBS-Friboi, 19.7 billion. The only Colombian corporation in the first ten is the government managed Ecopetrol with sales of 18.1 billion USD in seventh place.

The list of the first ten is completed with Brazil's Telemar NL, with sales of 17.1 billion and steel maker Gerdau, 15.25 billion.

Among the 30 Latinamerican corporations, 16 are Brazilian, 7 Mexican, four Chilean, two from Argentina and one Colombian.

The first Chilean company in the list is Enesis, ranked 15 and with sales of 11.99 billion USD and the first from Argentina, oil and gas corporation YPF, ranked 22, with sales of 8.9 billion.

Total sales of the top 30 Latam corporations in 2009 reached 488.738 billion USD which is 14% higher than in 2008 points out Economática.


 


LA ECONOMIA BRASILEÑA: ASOMBRO ENTRE ECONOMISTAS LOCALES Y EXTRANJEROS
Impactante crecimiento de Brasil en el primer trimestre: 9,84%
Según el Banco Central, el dato indicaría que la economía del gigante sudamericano trepará un mínimo de 6% este año. Y lograría la mayor tasa en un cuarto de siglo. Pero la novedad también preocupa porque se teme que genere inflación.

Por: Eleonora Gossman | Fuente: SAN PABLO. CORRESPONSAL


"¿Qué cree usted que deberíamos hacer en Grecia?", le preguntó el premier griego George Papandreu a su colega Lula da Silva cuando se encontraron hace dos días en Madrid. Quería saber si había alguna receta especial del nuevo "milagro brasileño" que permita al convaleciente país europeo salir de una crisis agónica. El brasileño, sorprendido, le respondió: "Ah, disculpe pero no soy quién para dar consejos". Lo cierto es que ayer se difundió una cifra apabullante del crecimiento productivo de Brasil en el primer trimestre del año: 9,84%.

La información brindada por el Banco Central asombró a economistas locales e internacionales. Ya se hablaba del "recalentamiento" de la economía brasileña, al punto que se barajó entre las consultoras privadas un aumento del Producto Bruto Interno (PBI) para 2010 de hasta 7,5 por ciento. El gobierno brasileño tenía, de hecho, indicios sobre ese desempeño y por eso, hace una semana, arbitró un plan de contingencia para reducir inmediatamente los gastos del gobierno en más de 5.000 millones de dólares, sin afectar -dijeron en Brasilia- las inversiones en obras públicas. Es que si se mantuviera el ritmo de evolución económica, Brasil crecería en 2010 9,5 por ciento. No es algo que desee el tándem integrado por el ministro de Hacienda, Guido Mantega, y el titular del Banco Central, Henrique Meirelles. Hasta ahora han dirigido con una envidiable eficiencia, algo que admite hasta la oposición. La razón, según dijeron ambos, es evitar que un consumo excesivo provoque una presión inflacionaria. Y sobre esto Lula, Mantega y Meirelles mantienen una coincidencia: no permitir el desmadre de los precios, aun sea a costa de poner el pie en el freno.

Ayer, el secretario de Política Económica Nelson Barbosa salió a defender que no existe un "super calentamiento" de la economía. Para el secretario del Tesoro Nacional Arno Augustin también esa expresión es excesiva. Declaró además que hay que ser muy cautos a la hora de cortar gastos. "Las medidas tienen que ser cuidadosamente contractivas" porque hay una crisis mundial en marcha que podría ser contraproducente si se quiere desacelerar más allá de lo necesario. Por otra parte, ambos funcionarios indicaron que el gran crecimiento del primer trimestre está relacionado con la gran caída del mismo período de 2009. "Es una consecuencia de la salida de la crisis. No podemos olvidar que el último trimestre de 2008 y el primero de 2009 representó una caída de 3% del PBI brasileño".

Cuando la prensa preguntó a Barbosa si el gobierno tomaría medidas fiscales a lo largo del año para ayudar a contener el avance económico, el funcionario respondió que esas decisiones se toman de acuerdo a cómo va el desempeño económico. A decir verdad, hablar de freno o desaceleración cuando existe una creciente inestabilidad en las economías europeas -al punto de hablarse del fin de la zona del euro- es cuanto menos aventurado. Brasil ya tuvo la experiencia de fines de 2008 y principios de 2009 cuando su economía se paralizó por el miedo provocado por la crisis financiera mundial. En aquel momento, no había medidas en cierne desplegadas para combatir las consecuencias dentro del país. Ahora se manejan más instrumentos y nadie puede jurar que no será preciso utilizar los sistemas de financiamiento de la demanda interna y la desgravación impositiva de sectores de consumo durable para impedir que las tormentas mundiales vuelvan a abatir la economía doméstica como ocurrió hace un año y medio.

La información del Banco Central sobre el aumento del PBI trimestral se basó en el análisis de tres sectores: el agro, la industria y los servicios. La institución evaluó también que la inflación este año será ligeramente superior a lo previsto, probablemente de 5 por ciento. El ministro Mantega llamó a ser "muy prudentes". A diferencia de los privados, ubicó el crecimiento anual entre 5,5 y 6 por ciento. Así lo indicó en Madrid en un foro de inversores extranjeros. También allí admitió que le tocará a los países del llamado BRIC -China, Brasil, India y Rusia- liderar la recuperación económica mundial en 2010. "Los 4 países darán cuenta de más del 60% del crecimiento global para este año", concluyó.


 



 


Brasil proyecta crecer 5,5% en 2010

Viernes 21 de mayo de 2010

n El gobierno de Brasil elevó de 5,2 a 5,5% la proyección de crecimiento de su economía para 2010, informó ayer el Ministerio de Planificación.

Este es uno de los escenarios tomados en consideración para definir el texto final del informe elevado al Parlamento, y modifica la proyección realizada en marzo, al relevarse la situación del primer bimestre.

"'Los países emergentes aportarán dos terceras partes del crecimiento mundial en el 2010", afirmó el Ministro de Hacienda brasileño.

En forma simultánea, el gobierno subió de 5 a 5,5% la expectativa para el índice oficial de su inflación este año, según consignó un despacho de la agencia Brasil. Debido al cambio en los parámetros de la economía, el gobierno anunció la semana pasada que reducirá en más de 10 mil millones de reales (0,3% del PIB) los gastos de los ministerios, como forma de mantener el crecimiento de manera sustentada.

De acuerdo con los técnicos del gobierno, la reducción de la demanda gubernamental permitirá un control inflacionario.


 


SE DIFICULTA EL REGRESO A LOS MERCADOS Y HAY TEMOR SOBRE EL IMPACTO EN EL FISCO
La crisis europea cierra la ventana financiera y puede complicar la caja K
El canje y la trunca colocación del nuevo bono son los factores inmediatos de contagio. Las devaluaciones del euro y el real mellan competitividad y precio de las exportaciones

ESTEBAN RAFELE Buenos Aires ()

La incertidumbre que envuelve al euro y obstaculizó el primer tramo del canje de deuda en default también puede poner en aprietos las cuentas del Gobierno, sobre todo si la tormenta financiera avanza sobre el precio de la soja y la fortaleza del dólar respecto de la moneda europea y el real continúa, lo que deprime la competitividad del peso.


 



 

El primer tramo del canje de deuda arrojó un resultado menor al esperado. Los u$s 8.500 millones que ingresaron hasta el viernes, o el 45% del total, no satisficieron ni al mercado ni a las autoridades, que aguardaban una aceptación de u$s 10.000 millones. El ministro de Economía, Amado Boudou, se mostró conforme con la cifra que ingresó a la operación, pero admitió que "este es un momento de alta volatilidad" que complica este tipo de acciones.

Este escenario también impidió al Gobierno emitir el bono por dinero fresco. Ayer, el riesgo país trepó a su máximo en ocho meses, hasta los 850 puntos y la tasa de retorno del Boden 15, bono de referencia para saber qué interés le exigirían los inversores a Argentina para prestarle dinero, subió hasta 15,3%.

Los economistas, que al principio de la crisis griega veían difícil un contagio al país, dicen ahora que el canal financiero será la primera vía de transmisión. "Por ahora, el único contagio que se ve es lo que ocurre con el canje y los bonos" afirmó Marina Dal Poggetto, del estudio Bein. Y comenzaron a temer un impacto en las exportaciones argentinas, sobre todo si la caída del euro –que ayer se tomó un respiro– continúa.

Es que el Gobierno se había asegurado un ingreso de al menos u$s 7.000 millones proveniente de las retenciones a las exportaciones de soja, cuyo precio cayó 2% desde el inicio de la crisis griega. Pero la apreciación del dólar y la consiguiente pérdida de valor de las commodities puede repercutir en el fisco, en momentos en que la administración de Cristina Fernández está comprometida en expandir con fuerza el gasto para cebar el consumo y la obra pública con el tipo de cambio como ancla contra la inflación. "Previo a la crisis europea, las perspectivas de apreciación cambiaria real estaban en torno al 9%. Actualmente se ubican en 13%", indicó la consultora Prefinex.

La devaluación del real, que supera el 8% desde el inicio de la debacle griega, complica este panorama y torna menos competitivas a las exportaciones industriales hacia Brasil. Y, vale recordarlo, Europa representa el 17% de las exportaciones, según Abeceb.com, pero el país vecino es el principal socio comercial.

Así las cosas, el fenomenal repunte de la actividad –la industria creció más del 9% en abril, para FIEL– podría opacarse a partir del segundo semestre si esta tendencia continúa. "Si hay devaluaciones o salidas del euro, nadie sabe qué puede pasar y va a haber un 'vuelo a la calidad' muy importante", dijo el economista de Prefinex Nicolás Bridger. Las consultoras y el Gobierno todavía confían en el auge del consumo y de la cosecha de soja récord y vaticinan una expansión del PIB de entre 5% y 6,5% para el año. Pero si la tragedia griega continúa, pueden empezar a afinar esos números.